Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
The Great British Bake Off - Why Does It Offend Some People?
Appparently having eight out of the twelve contestants being of white Northern European extraction isn't enough. The BBC had the audacity to include two from Asian background, a biracial woman and a bloke from S.E. Asia.
One of the contestants had tattoos, which was enough for Quinten Letts to remark on (only God knows why)!
If this is evidence of the BBC 'box ticking', what is the answer? Should competitions such as these be open only to those who can prove their Britishness going back ten generations?
And does this suggest that those on the political right secretly believe that if you have brown skin, any success you may have is nothing to do with your skills or qualities, but because of preferential treatment (ie. if you're not white, you're not as good)?
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/d ebate/a rticle- 3178064 /I-ador e-Great -Britis h-Bake- does-ri ght-Ask s-QUENT IN-LETT S.html
One of the contestants had tattoos, which was enough for Quinten Letts to remark on (only God knows why)!
If this is evidence of the BBC 'box ticking', what is the answer? Should competitions such as these be open only to those who can prove their Britishness going back ten generations?
And does this suggest that those on the political right secretly believe that if you have brown skin, any success you may have is nothing to do with your skills or qualities, but because of preferential treatment (ie. if you're not white, you're not as good)?
http://
Answers
Some people exist to get offended. Presumably all the contestants had to go through rounds before getting on the show, they all seem to be competant bakers. It's nice seeing different ingredients and flavourings being used in British favourites, that's what comes with the diversity.
19:46 Thu 06th Aug 2015
My husband is the only person who bakes in this house, I've not baked in years. He loves the scientific fiddliness of the whole process, it just annoys me, but I do enjoy the end result. He makes and decorates a Christmas cake every year, and his Christmas puddings are legendary, they have even been enjoyed in Sweden!
Likewise, one off my sons enjoys baking too, he won first prize in his works great British bake off a couple of years ago.
Neither have ever made flapjacks though ;o)
Likewise, one off my sons enjoys baking too, he won first prize in his works great British bake off a couple of years ago.
Neither have ever made flapjacks though ;o)
I’m not sure I understand where this question is coming from or what answers are expected. If I’ve read it correctly there seems to be two separate issues going on here. On the one hand minority groups have been complaining for years about being under-represented but if Mr Letts is right and a concerted effort has been made to be seen to include them in this programme, the non-white contingent are now asking if they’re receiving preferential treatment simply because they are perceived to be “not as good” as white people. Where did that come from? I’m confused.
naomi24
My question is based on Quinten Lett's comments about box ticking.
Have a look at the story in the Mail - it will all make sense.
Basically, it seems that people are not happy about the mix of people on the show because it features people who are not white, people with tattoos and a woman who works out.
I'm asking - is this a problem for anyone here??
My question is based on Quinten Lett's comments about box ticking.
Have a look at the story in the Mail - it will all make sense.
Basically, it seems that people are not happy about the mix of people on the show because it features people who are not white, people with tattoos and a woman who works out.
I'm asking - is this a problem for anyone here??
sp1814
/// There are twelve contestants on the show, and half are men. That's a surprisingly high number - how many men have you met who have impressed you with their flapjacks? ///
And why shouldn't they be that amount of men, do they not represent 50% of the population?
But if you are referring to their cooking abilities, there should be a higher proportion of men, because it is a known fact that men make better cooks than men.
Take Chefs for instance, more Chefs are male.
/// There are twelve contestants on the show, and half are men. That's a surprisingly high number - how many men have you met who have impressed you with their flapjacks? ///
And why shouldn't they be that amount of men, do they not represent 50% of the population?
But if you are referring to their cooking abilities, there should be a higher proportion of men, because it is a known fact that men make better cooks than men.
Take Chefs for instance, more Chefs are male.
Not enough whites represented in the Notting-Hill Carnival, something must be done.
http:// www.sta ndard.c o.uk/in coming/ article 9653272 .ece/al ternate s/w620/ notting %20hill %20carn ival%20 1975%20 .jpg
http://
murraymints - //am I the only person in the universe that has not, and never will, watch this ? //
No, I have never watched it, and never will - because I don't watch any 'food' programmes because food does not interest me in the slightest.
But to the Question in hand - I think Mr Letts knows his audience well, and knows how to push buttons to get readers - and that's fine, it's his job.
If he chooses to manufacture a 'controversy' where clearly none exists, I think we should do the sensible thing and ignore him - and the programme, as an equal waste of valuable time for those who are simply not bothered about any aspect of either.
No, I have never watched it, and never will - because I don't watch any 'food' programmes because food does not interest me in the slightest.
But to the Question in hand - I think Mr Letts knows his audience well, and knows how to push buttons to get readers - and that's fine, it's his job.
If he chooses to manufacture a 'controversy' where clearly none exists, I think we should do the sensible thing and ignore him - and the programme, as an equal waste of valuable time for those who are simply not bothered about any aspect of either.
SP, I understand the issue that Mr Letts has raised – what I don’t understand is your question //does this suggest that those on the political right secretly believe that if you have brown skin, any success you may have is nothing to do with your skills or qualities, but because of preferential treatment (ie. if you're not white, you're not as good)?//
You haven't suggested that the other minorities may have been given preferential treatment because they aren't as good as people who aren't members of a minority group. Why apply that question solely the non-whites?
You haven't suggested that the other minorities may have been given preferential treatment because they aren't as good as people who aren't members of a minority group. Why apply that question solely the non-whites?
AOG - ///// No, I have never watched it, and never will - because I don't watch any 'food' programmes because food does not interest me in the slightest. ///
Not interested enough, not to want to eat it?
Andy you must be starving. :0) //
I see your point - but I find food about as interesting as oxygen - but equally vital, so I do ingest, but a simple pill giving me all the nutrients I needed would be just fine.
Not interested enough, not to want to eat it?
Andy you must be starving. :0) //
I see your point - but I find food about as interesting as oxygen - but equally vital, so I do ingest, but a simple pill giving me all the nutrients I needed would be just fine.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.