Books & Authors2 mins ago
Has The Leadership Election Process Been Infiltrated?
11 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It looks straight forward to me, the two female aspirants are no Margaret Thatcher and that leaves Andy Burnham or Jeremy Corbin.
There is little doubt that there is a move within the Labour party for a move to the left and that only means a win for JC and that I predict.
Now, will that win Labour the next election and this has little to do with infiltration.
There is little doubt that there is a move within the Labour party for a move to the left and that only means a win for JC and that I predict.
Now, will that win Labour the next election and this has little to do with infiltration.
I am a lifelong Labour person but you don't need to be Einstein or a top political commentator to see that if you allow Joe Bloggs to pay £3 to vote then you are going to have people voting who are not committed Labour people. No matter who ends up winning (though it will be Andy Burnham anyway I suspect) then that is a ridiculous state of affairs
"This election is being fought under rules that were agreed by the whole party last year."
BUT….
“Labour MPs were "dumbfounded" when they learned how the contest was to be run…”
So where were they last year then?
I fail to see how the process has been "infiltrated". The party has effectively opened up their leadership election to anybody with three quid to spare (as well as the inclination to get involved in such a non-event). All they have to do is tick a box that says the support the aims of the Party. To infiltrate means to enter surreptitiously or clandestinely. It's scarcely cloak and dagger stuff if a few people pay their three quid and, shall we say, be somewhat economical with the truth when they tick the box.
BUT….
“Labour MPs were "dumbfounded" when they learned how the contest was to be run…”
So where were they last year then?
I fail to see how the process has been "infiltrated". The party has effectively opened up their leadership election to anybody with three quid to spare (as well as the inclination to get involved in such a non-event). All they have to do is tick a box that says the support the aims of the Party. To infiltrate means to enter surreptitiously or clandestinely. It's scarcely cloak and dagger stuff if a few people pay their three quid and, shall we say, be somewhat economical with the truth when they tick the box.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.