Food & Drink0 min ago
Is It Innevitable That R.0P. Extremists Will Eventually Acquire The Material To Build A Dirty Bomb?
18 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
No one in their right mind would sell material to a client who seems mad enough to deploy it because they (the seller) can have no way of knowing where the buyer is planning to set it off; if they are enjoying their life in a major conurbation then there is a serious possibility that it will become the target.
As for any potential buyer, mad as they may be I just hope that they are not also ignorant: about the planet's prevailing winds running from west to east, for example. Wherever they live, the radioactivity will be coming their way. If not airborne, it will spread via the oceans. Their deity will not magically intervene to save them from its effects.
And, yes, the maddest thing about the concept of mutually assured destruction was the idea that shelters would deliver anyone safely back to a remotely habitable planet, where farming or fishing might still be viable.
As for any potential buyer, mad as they may be I just hope that they are not also ignorant: about the planet's prevailing winds running from west to east, for example. Wherever they live, the radioactivity will be coming their way. If not airborne, it will spread via the oceans. Their deity will not magically intervene to save them from its effects.
And, yes, the maddest thing about the concept of mutually assured destruction was the idea that shelters would deliver anyone safely back to a remotely habitable planet, where farming or fishing might still be viable.
Does it matter if they do or not ?
It's the blast from the explosives which would do the most damage, in terms of killing or injuring people, not the radioactive material mixed in with the explosives.
The aftermath of the explosion would tie up resources to control the panic, decontaminate the area and people affected by the radioactive material, but the liklihood of anyone exposed dying as a result of the exposure is minimal.
It's the blast from the explosives which would do the most damage, in terms of killing or injuring people, not the radioactive material mixed in with the explosives.
The aftermath of the explosion would tie up resources to control the panic, decontaminate the area and people affected by the radioactive material, but the liklihood of anyone exposed dying as a result of the exposure is minimal.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.