Racist Killer Wins His Human Rights Case

[trt]

He has cost the taxpayer £400,000 because he was kept in solitary confinement for his own safety.

How can it be called his human rights, when he stabs a 15yr old boy and sets him alight when he was still alive.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3273429/Human-rights-barbaric-racist-killer-Savage-sadistic-murderer-kept-segregation-protection-wins-case-racks-400-000-legal-aid-bills.html

[jno]

they had to seek ministerial permission. They didn't. That was careless, and now expensive. Why can't these people just follow the required procedures?

Now he'll have to take his chances with other prisoners, I suppose.

[ToraToraTora]

human rights are only for criminal scum, surely you have realise that by now. The FOCS will be along soon to tell you what decent misunderstood chap he is.

[wolf63]

FOCS ?

[fiction-factory]

>human rights are only for criminal scum,

Do you really believe such nonsense, TTT?

[fiction-factory]

People throw in slogans and TLAs like ROP or ***, just like in business, to try to sound knowledgeable when they haven't got any sensible points to make

[Mamyalynne]

As Jno says, if only they would follow the correct procedures these cases wouldn't arise.


They must surely know what the outcome may be, shoddy all round.

[ToraToraTora]

just how it seems FF, hardly a week goes by that doesn't have some lowlife claiming his "human" rights have been violated because he doesn't like the colour of the bog roll. So some ooman rites lawyer earns a fortune on the case. While the rest of us can have our human rights violated at will.

[jourdain2]

Procedures should be followed. That's the reasonable me.
The real me feels that he should have been sentenced to solitary confinement for the rest of his life - without possibility of appeal, he's old enough not to change.

There we are, I await the Human Rights response.

[vetuste_ennemi]

"The authorities broke rules by failing to get ministerial permission to keep Shahid in isolation, until after his 72-hour initial segregation on moving between jails.
This meant his human right to privacy had been violated, the judges said..."

Keeping him in isolation is violating his right to privacy? Please help me - how, exactly, does that logic work?

[jno]

human rights are for humans; the clue's in the name. Even TTT has some so it's nonsense to talk about them only applying to criminals.

Everyone should be subject to the law equally, and this person wasn't. All they had to do was get the permission. They didn't and that's what the payout's for. It was the same with Ed Balls getting Sharon Shoesmith sacked. If the people who enforce laws can't be bothered obeying them themselves, we all have to contribute to their laziness fund.

[Mamyalynne]

//Five Supreme Court judges agreed Shahid’s ‘right to a private life’ under Section 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights had been violated.//


I guess we need to read that section of the act.

[EDDIE51]

I would not want to share cell with him if I was in jail.
What about the 'human rights' of prisoners who will now be forced to be cooped up 23 hours a day with someone who's idea of 'fun' is to burn them alive?

[Matheous-2]

Being an inhuman act that was committed -Human Rights should not be extended to any gutter level thug or murderer.

[youngmafbog]

Just because some idiotic law and a bunch of right-on judges (who are snout in the HRA trough) say something does not make it right.

Clearly 400K for this is ridiculous.

Wonder how much compo he will get now?

And probably let out by the same right-on brigade.

[Svejk]

It's disgusting and so is he and so are the lawyers with their snouts in the trough.

[TWR]

This is a UK Justice System, written by UK & EU Idiots.

[Jackdaw33]

Had he done this 60 years ago he would not be in a position to make a claim. He would have been kept in isolation for about 6 weeks until the morning Mr Pierrepoint paid him a visit.