Quizzes & Puzzles6 mins ago
It Would Seem That This Young Lady Did Not Practice What She Preached?
55 Answers
http://
/// One of the issues she spoke most passionately about was the problem of sexual aggression against women. Indeed, she had unflinchingly asserted the wildly controversial (and utterly unproven) statistic that ‘one woman in four’ at Oxford can expect to be raped. ///
And not just by men it would seem.
/// One of the issues she spoke most passionately about was the problem of sexual aggression against women. Indeed, she had unflinchingly asserted the wildly controversial (and utterly unproven) statistic that ‘one woman in four’ at Oxford can expect to be raped. ///
And not just by men it would seem.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
AOG
I am not going to accuse you of anything without proof. I know that you're sick of people casting aspersions on why you raise certain questions, and I'm not going to be one of those.
I have agreed with you that this woman certainly seems to be a hypocrite and did not practice what she preached.
If you want to widen the debate (ignoring why I think you've raised this), there is an interesting discussion point...women and sexual assault
Or rather - women and rape. Without going into the specific mechanics of the deed - can a woman be charged with the rape of another woman?
She can certainly be changed with sexual assault - I'm wondering whether she can be charged with the more serious offence?
I am not going to accuse you of anything without proof. I know that you're sick of people casting aspersions on why you raise certain questions, and I'm not going to be one of those.
I have agreed with you that this woman certainly seems to be a hypocrite and did not practice what she preached.
If you want to widen the debate (ignoring why I think you've raised this), there is an interesting discussion point...women and sexual assault
Or rather - women and rape. Without going into the specific mechanics of the deed - can a woman be charged with the rape of another woman?
She can certainly be changed with sexual assault - I'm wondering whether she can be charged with the more serious offence?
Orderlimit
Surely you can't accuse me of derailing the thread!
All I'm doing is opening up the debate, because other then agreeing or disagreeing that this young woman is not practicing what she preaches, there's not that much to take a view on.
Getting to your point about women not being able to commit rape - I think they can. I really do.
They would have to use a sex toy though. That's the 'specific mechanics' I was referring to.
Surely you can't accuse me of derailing the thread!
All I'm doing is opening up the debate, because other then agreeing or disagreeing that this young woman is not practicing what she preaches, there's not that much to take a view on.
Getting to your point about women not being able to commit rape - I think they can. I really do.
They would have to use a sex toy though. That's the 'specific mechanics' I was referring to.
//Capacity
At common law a boy under the age of fourteen years could not commit rape as a principal offender[15] as he was irrebutably presumed to be incapable of sexual intercourse. This rule was abolished by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1993. A boy under the age of fourteen years could commit rape as an accomplice.[16]
It was never decided whether a boy under fourteen could be convicted of attempting to commit rape as a principal, rather than an accomplice, if he attempted to have sexual intercourse or actually succeeded in doing so. The reported dicta did not agree on this point.[17]
A woman could not commit rape as a principal offender, by the nature of the offence, but she could commit rape as an accomplice.[18]//
https:/
At common law a boy under the age of fourteen years could not commit rape as a principal offender[15] as he was irrebutably presumed to be incapable of sexual intercourse. This rule was abolished by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1993. A boy under the age of fourteen years could commit rape as an accomplice.[16]
It was never decided whether a boy under fourteen could be convicted of attempting to commit rape as a principal, rather than an accomplice, if he attempted to have sexual intercourse or actually succeeded in doing so. The reported dicta did not agree on this point.[17]
A woman could not commit rape as a principal offender, by the nature of the offence, but she could commit rape as an accomplice.[18]//
https:/
Since we are constantly reminded that rape is about control rather than sexual gratification, perhaps the strict definition of the isertion of a male member needs to be looked at by lawmakers.
Exotic Svengali types have many ways to influence and thereby manipulate and control situations, moving them past the point where a person's limits would normally be.
Now, is the unspoken question not being asked of aog by our resident community relations specialist "Is it because she's black?"
Exotic Svengali types have many ways to influence and thereby manipulate and control situations, moving them past the point where a person's limits would normally be.
Now, is the unspoken question not being asked of aog by our resident community relations specialist "Is it because she's black?"
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.