ChatterBank2 mins ago
Turkeys Voting For Christmas?
24 Answers
If I was Dave I'd sweep the whole sorry shower down the kasi and have a 100 member elected house. This latest insolence gives him the excuse he needs to do just that.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.TTT...The Tories have had many years to reform the HOL and they showed no willingness to do so whatsoever ! Why would they, when they an in-built advantage in keeping the status quo ?
I am with you if you are putting a case for an elected 2nd chamber.
But, as you say Turkeys rarely vote for Xmas. There are many presently in the HOC that know they they are likely to transfer into the HOL at some point in the future.
So, I wouldn't hold your breath.
I am with you if you are putting a case for an elected 2nd chamber.
But, as you say Turkeys rarely vote for Xmas. There are many presently in the HOC that know they they are likely to transfer into the HOL at some point in the future.
So, I wouldn't hold your breath.
Well said old geezer.
The House is doing its job. It isn't as if there was a referendum on tax credits the result of which the Lords is trying to stop.
The legislation will still go through but hopefully with modifications caused because the Lords said 'thing again'
I believe there were three motions, one of which was much more aggressive, which was easily defeated
Making the upper house electable would actually probably undermine the authority of the lower house After all we all seem to want less of these terrible legislators :-)
What is needed is a proper constitution, not a series of 'conventions'
The House is doing its job. It isn't as if there was a referendum on tax credits the result of which the Lords is trying to stop.
The legislation will still go through but hopefully with modifications caused because the Lords said 'thing again'
I believe there were three motions, one of which was much more aggressive, which was easily defeated
Making the upper house electable would actually probably undermine the authority of the lower house After all we all seem to want less of these terrible legislators :-)
What is needed is a proper constitution, not a series of 'conventions'
If only the government had thought to propose a reform of the House of Lords, turning it into an elected chamber...
Oh, wait.
https:/ /en.wik ipedia. org/wik i/House _of_Lor ds_Refo rm_Bill _2012
Oh, wait.
https:/
To be fair to Cameron, he supported that bill at the time and was defeated by a large-scale Tory rebellion. All the same, the Tories as a whole have themselves to blame for the continuing existence of an unelected Upper Chamber, continually rejecting or quashing attempts to reform it.
I can't say I have much sympathy for Osborne over this defeat. Still, if it does expose some of the problems in the system it will have been worth it.
I can't say I have much sympathy for Osborne over this defeat. Still, if it does expose some of the problems in the system it will have been worth it.
For once in my life I was happy to have the House of Lords to block the Tax Credit changes. As a Scot, I am sick to the back teeth with this government. They don't seem to live in the real world and would happily spend as much on a single meal out as some families have to live on for a week. The sooner we get total independence the better. Meantime, thank you House of Lords.