@ Bazwillrun but also taking in other comments here....given that breastfeeding is proven strategy for reducing illnesses later in life, and given the hideous success of corporations like nestle in persuading vulnerable women that breastfeeding was inadequate / gross / a sign of poverty / unfeminine, maybe it ain't so bad to get someone skilled to turn women's thinking towards breastfeeding as an alternative to expensive purchased milk? Kinda like, money in the bank for later on? As all illness costs society, eventually?
Like reducing HIV, injury and exploitation (ref the cottaging outrage cited by Baz)
Is there something actually wrong and outrageous in reducing harm - if only because permitting harm to happen costs all of us dear in the long run?
And....is every aspect of society actually an accounting exercise? Would our society actually be better/ happier/ less stressed if we accepted that certain functions are outwith that rather narrow assessment?