ChatterBank0 min ago
So Will It Happen?
10 Answers
Or have a few rotten apples tainted the industry for good?
http:// news.sk y.com/s tory/15 85483/c arney-h opes-uk -will-s tart-to -respec t-banke rs
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Perhaps if the 'good bankers' had been a bit more forthcoming with evidence to jail the 'few bad apples' (few??) then there'd be a chance of rehabilitation.
As it is the culture of 'omerta' means that they are all still, quite correctly, regarded as guilty until proven innocent and should be treated with uniform suspicion and contempt.
As it is the culture of 'omerta' means that they are all still, quite correctly, regarded as guilty until proven innocent and should be treated with uniform suspicion and contempt.
I think Mr Carney was talking about the top brass, rather than those of you at more humble levels (unless you really are quite high up the banking tree) - my comments were likewise aimed at those in postions of power/responsibility.
I'm obviously prepared to accept that you and your day-to-day colleagues knew *** all about the criminal activities - but the concept that no-one knew what was going on and 'who dunnit' is ludicrous.
I'm obviously prepared to accept that you and your day-to-day colleagues knew *** all about the criminal activities - but the concept that no-one knew what was going on and 'who dunnit' is ludicrous.
If we are talking good reputations, then I do not think they will ever win it back. Just like Trade Unions will forever be blamed for the Winter of Disontent, the bankers will forever take the rap for the financial crisis.
Of course in both instances, they were not universally loved to begin with. The Unions had long been an obstacle to progress, and the banks had longtime ripped off companies.
Again, in both instances, the Government(s) were happy for the Unions and banks to take the blame for the mess, to hid their own dismal performance in regulating them.
Of course in both instances, they were not universally loved to begin with. The Unions had long been an obstacle to progress, and the banks had longtime ripped off companies.
Again, in both instances, the Government(s) were happy for the Unions and banks to take the blame for the mess, to hid their own dismal performance in regulating them.
Goodwin was reckless in his acqisitions but also a little unlucky. The takeover of ABN Amro left the company seriously short of money. RBS had planned to raise money by selling a US subsiduary. Unfortunately that sale became impossible chiefly because its 3 executives were locked up for their involvement in the Enron scandal.
Had the US sale gone through, RBS might not have needed bailing out.
Had the US sale gone through, RBS might not have needed bailing out.