Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well , one has the follow the rules in the workplace - if that wasn't clear before this makes it clearer.
Yeah, where's his right to while away a few boring hours chatting to his friends and family.
In the case stated the communication channel wasn't agreed to be a private one but one associated with the workplace. One would hope a genuine private channel would not be accessible by an employer, and any suggestion that the employer would have the right to spy on it, thrown out. It seems a little tough to get sacked for something as minor as sending "private" messages though. A warning would seem more proportionate.
He may have already had formal warnings.
If you go sticking your private stuff on someone else (your employer) accounts then what do you expect?
Do you have huge muscles in your right arm by any chance?
oops - wrong thread. Sorry AOG
Not seen an arm wresting thread here ???
All very small potatoes unfortunately. Now if the ECHR had made a decision where a Jamaican arch Criminal with a moll and fifteen kids was refused a right to a deportation appeal because he suddenly realised he was a homosexual then that would be a coup worthy of celebration.
Right to a family life in the UK because a criminal had just bought a cat etc etc.
It's not 'small potatoes'. Although this particular employee was working in Romania it will apply to every employee in the UK.
Any one know what the phone tariff is for Whatsapp ?
Question Author
retrocop

It's free.
Irrespective of the rights or wrongs of the case, yet again a "foreign" court is telling us what we can and cant do in our country....
Mr aog
Exactly. No major fraud or scams here yet ECHR cosset criminals!!
We don't know how long he was spending private messaging when he should have been working.
If I was using my bosses email etc to send private messages then he should be able to read them.
There is a ABer who allegedly works for a nationalised British company who spends most of his/her day on AB ,or so they say ,on the companies computer. Said ABer is a pain . Wish the ECHR would catch up on that individual and suspend them. :-)

1 to 18 of 18rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Here Is One Romanian Who Wasn't Granted His Human Rights By The European Court Of Human Rights.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.