Donate SIGN UP

Two Murders - No Witnesses

Avatar Image
Canary42 | 01:40 Thu 11th Feb 2016 | News
3 Answers
This makes interesting reading. His first murder (no witnesses) was recorded as an accident, but the second one (no witnesses) raised doubts about the first.

Evidence gathered on the second was sufficient to convict him - evidence on the first now being re-visited casts doubts on that one also.

Could the first have been handled better - easy with hindsight of course.

Read it, and see what you think.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/husband-pushed-wife-130ft-cliff-7307598?ref=yfp
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
This case may be of some interest. It allowed similar facts to be adduced as evidence in court.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Joseph_Smith

Question Author
That's fascinating jackdaw, with its similarities too - and an excellent investigation by Spilsbury but a bit alarming that there was almost another victim when D I Neil tested Spilsbury's hypothesis.

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Two Murders - No Witnesses

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.