Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
Drunks On Flights
How bout introducing breathalyser tests for passengers and, if they're over the limit, they're not allowed to fly?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by vernonk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It already is illegal to allow passengers who are drunk to board a flight. They are a safety risk, if there is an emergency evacuation. These people should never have been allowed on the plane. Other passengers said that at the departure gate this group were so drunk they were having difficulty standing up.
hey Ludo when I was in isolation I woke up to find a dement coming out of my personalised bog at 2 am and throwing her teno- nappy in my face which is what might have woken me .... and going back to her bed
sand no it was not a dream. she got norovirus after me I hesitate to say I gave it to her - hem hem she stole it from me.....
it was just like the wedding night scene in Jane Eyre
erm xc the word norovirus does not occur in that book
Sister was NOT pleased;it wrecked her norovirus stats
sand no it was not a dream. she got norovirus after me I hesitate to say I gave it to her - hem hem she stole it from me.....
it was just like the wedding night scene in Jane Eyre
erm xc the word norovirus does not occur in that book
Sister was NOT pleased;it wrecked her norovirus stats
When I travel on holiday flights, I would estimate the majority of people are over the driving limit. And they are sold alcohol on the plane and carryon drinking. Even so, most flights reach their destination without incident.
So the breathalyser idea is a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and would punish the majority of passengers who have done nothing wrong.
So the breathalyser idea is a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and would punish the majority of passengers who have done nothing wrong.
I sympathise absolutely with passengers cooped up with these morons, and other like them.
I have no sympathy with the airlines because they could ensure that airport operators cease to make vast profits from airport bars.
If you give a proportion of the population a few hours to hang around, and a bar, they will drink - that is human nature, which is exploited by the airport operators.
That said, the responsibility for safety lies with the individual crew on each aircraft, and it is for them to see potential trouble in passengers who have obviously had to too much to drink, and stop them from boarding.
This situation could have been prevented if the rules which are in place were implemented properly.
I have no sympathy with the airlines because they could ensure that airport operators cease to make vast profits from airport bars.
If you give a proportion of the population a few hours to hang around, and a bar, they will drink - that is human nature, which is exploited by the airport operators.
That said, the responsibility for safety lies with the individual crew on each aircraft, and it is for them to see potential trouble in passengers who have obviously had to too much to drink, and stop them from boarding.
This situation could have been prevented if the rules which are in place were implemented properly.
Why has this not been implemented ?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/w orld/20 15/sep/ 19/drun k-air-p assenge rs-coul d-be-ba nned-bo arding- uk-flig hts
http://