Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
When Does An Englishman's Castle No Longer Becomes His Own?
22 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Seems to be based on this bit CJ;
///Judge Elizabeth Cooke denied his application to take back control of the property on the basis that he was not a registered administrator of his mother’s estate.
Mrs Curtis had died without a will and her son had not realised he had to apply to become an administrator.///
It's a difficult one, AOG......of course the squatter should have no right to the house......I think it's theft.
But Mr Curtis left the house empty and becoming derelict for twenty years.... he couldn't visit and when he was told he no longer needed to pay council tax assumed it was due to the state of the house. So he was aware it was in a state it seems.
He could have appointed someone to keep the house up to scratch if only for the sake of the neighbours.....or maybe rented it out with an agent caring for it.
It's sad, but I wouldn't want a property next door to me neglected and derelict for that long.
But Mr Curtis left the house empty and becoming derelict for twenty years.... he couldn't visit and when he was told he no longer needed to pay council tax assumed it was due to the state of the house. So he was aware it was in a state it seems.
He could have appointed someone to keep the house up to scratch if only for the sake of the neighbours.....or maybe rented it out with an agent caring for it.
It's sad, but I wouldn't want a property next door to me neglected and derelict for that long.
It says that Mr Best-the squatter- started renovating the house when he moved in. It sounds like he cared more for the condition of the property than the owner,and actually kept it from deteriorating.
I don't understand why the owner never once in 20 years bothered to visit the property...surely it entered his head that his inheritance would be losing value in that time?
While I don't support squatting,it's difficult to feel sympathy for the owner
I don't understand why the owner never once in 20 years bothered to visit the property...surely it entered his head that his inheritance would be losing value in that time?
While I don't support squatting,it's difficult to feel sympathy for the owner
Difficult situation , the Gentleman should not have to sell his flat to pay costs though.
However should people be allowed to bight the neighbourhood by allowing properties to rot for decades?
There's one on my daughters road, all houses pristine and gardens bonny , this one - the guy doesn't care a jot and visits once a year if that. Even the Council's Empty Properties Officer has offered help, to no avail.
However should people be allowed to bight the neighbourhood by allowing properties to rot for decades?
There's one on my daughters road, all houses pristine and gardens bonny , this one - the guy doesn't care a jot and visits once a year if that. Even the Council's Empty Properties Officer has offered help, to no avail.
govt info on squatters' rights here
https:/ /www.go v.uk/sq uatting -law/sq uatters -rights -to-pro perty
the squatter fits the bill.
also from the AB thread he inherited the house from his mum ( intestate on the facts ) and didnt put the house in his own name AND didnt eject the trespasser so when the time came for him to prove better title ... he couldnt. oops !
https:/
the squatter fits the bill.
also from the AB thread he inherited the house from his mum ( intestate on the facts ) and didnt put the house in his own name AND didnt eject the trespasser so when the time came for him to prove better title ... he couldnt. oops !
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.