Alas the police and the CPS have a very difficult job when dealing with DV and I hope those advising Mrs May ensure she is well acquainted with those difficulties.
In some of the work I do I encounter some DV victims and before the police and CPS are condemned it is worth understanding some of the problems they face. It’s always easy to bandy statistics about but one very telling feature is that DV victims have suffered an average of more than 20 attacks before they seek help from the police. Then they frequently insist that “I don’t want to see him in court. I just want him warned”. (Yes I know that around 15% of DV victims are male, but I’ll keep it one way round for simplicity). They then want to withdraw statements or “don’t want to press charges”. (Have a look in “Law” and see the “How can I withdraw my statement against my O/H?” questions).
If the CPS do prosecute they face an uphill struggle to get the victim (very often the only witness) to court. Witness summonses are often used (rarely necessary in any other type of prosecution). I’ve lost count of the number of victim witnesses brought to court who “cannot remember” having their lights punched out on Saturday night just a few weeks earlier despite having made a detailled statement soon after the event.
DV is a huge problem for the police and CPS. The police often get called to an address they have been to many times before knowing that by the time they get there the incident will be over and that “I don’t want to take it further” will be the response they face. Mrs May should tread carefully before she draws the conclusion that the police are letting down the victims of DV. Very often it is the victims who let the police down by failing to properly support prosecutions against their attackers.