ChatterBank1 min ago
Riots In Calais?
Just heard about these (passingly) on the radio?
Anyone have a further link/info?
Anyone have a further link/info?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ric.ror. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I think this was discussed on here, will have a look - in the meantime (hope the link works Ric
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/wor ldnews/ europe/ france/ 1117930 2/Frenc h-riot- police- in-batt le-with -Calais -migran ts-
http://
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/wor ldnews/ europe/ france/ 1117930 2/Frenc h-riot- police- in-batt le-with -Calais -migran ts-in-p ictures .html
I don't know whether this link will open. It appears that there has been two days of riots, and tear gas response by the French police, to control migrants who launched an attack to gain access to lorries bound for ................The UK. It has been kept pretty quiet has it not. I note also that the Telegraph closed the comments page on the article.
I don't know whether this link will open. It appears that there has been two days of riots, and tear gas response by the French police, to control migrants who launched an attack to gain access to lorries bound for ................The UK. It has been kept pretty quiet has it not. I note also that the Telegraph closed the comments page on the article.
alba, If we are foolish enough to vote with the Remainians, we will be dragged into the Schengen agreement. Guess what happens then? That's right millions yes millions of migrants would be free to travel across Europe freely and into the UK. Italy, France, Germany, all off them could even provide free transport (which they are covertly doing at the moment by not ejecting ticketless migrants from trains and buses heading west) all the way to Britain. We have been ordered by the EUSSR to build more homes and accommodation in their latest edict, not for our citizens mind. For the migrants.
There is nothing unusual in the events portrayed by pictures. It’s everyday life in Calais and is becoming so in Dunkirk as well.
I gave up visiting or passing through Calais (which I used to do about five or six times a year) about three years ago. I was in the port waiting for my return ferry when the port itself was stormed by hundreds of migrants. I don’t scare easily but I feared for my safety and that of my travelling companions. However I know a few people who still brave the trip and the town and particularly its surrounding areas have degenerated into a vast no go area. The French need to get a grip on the situation but, like these pictures, it is nothing new as they have needed to do so for some years.
“In fact Brexit might mean the French would not get involved in trying to stop migration from Calais to UK so we'd have to deal with them at our end when/if we catch them”
Not so. As I have explained before the “Le Touquet” agreement (which juxtaposes British and French border controls on opposite sides of the Channel) has nothing to do with the EU. It is a simple bi-lateral agreement between the UK and France (of the type that many nations negotiate without the need to run it past a supranational executive). As I also explained the French are most unlikely to withdraw from it as it is not in their interests.
Of course our leaving the EU will not stop the masses congregating across the Channel. The EU’s own Schengen Agreement allows them to roam all over the continent seeking their destination of choice. But Togo is absolutely correct and voters need to be under no illusions. If the UK votes to remain, on 24th June all bets are off. Any of the earth shattering reforms that Mr Cameron told us he had secured will be quietly ditched and moves will be afoot the include the UK in the EU’s migrant “distribution” scheme. That will make the trickle of clandestines currently making it across the Channel seem like a spoonful of sugar. Remember, you heard it here first so don’t say you were not warned.
PS - the vast majority of those in Calais are not fleeing war, albaqwerty. Never have been.
I gave up visiting or passing through Calais (which I used to do about five or six times a year) about three years ago. I was in the port waiting for my return ferry when the port itself was stormed by hundreds of migrants. I don’t scare easily but I feared for my safety and that of my travelling companions. However I know a few people who still brave the trip and the town and particularly its surrounding areas have degenerated into a vast no go area. The French need to get a grip on the situation but, like these pictures, it is nothing new as they have needed to do so for some years.
“In fact Brexit might mean the French would not get involved in trying to stop migration from Calais to UK so we'd have to deal with them at our end when/if we catch them”
Not so. As I have explained before the “Le Touquet” agreement (which juxtaposes British and French border controls on opposite sides of the Channel) has nothing to do with the EU. It is a simple bi-lateral agreement between the UK and France (of the type that many nations negotiate without the need to run it past a supranational executive). As I also explained the French are most unlikely to withdraw from it as it is not in their interests.
Of course our leaving the EU will not stop the masses congregating across the Channel. The EU’s own Schengen Agreement allows them to roam all over the continent seeking their destination of choice. But Togo is absolutely correct and voters need to be under no illusions. If the UK votes to remain, on 24th June all bets are off. Any of the earth shattering reforms that Mr Cameron told us he had secured will be quietly ditched and moves will be afoot the include the UK in the EU’s migrant “distribution” scheme. That will make the trickle of clandestines currently making it across the Channel seem like a spoonful of sugar. Remember, you heard it here first so don’t say you were not warned.
PS - the vast majority of those in Calais are not fleeing war, albaqwerty. Never have been.