Society & Culture1 min ago
Why Is The Us So Determined To Continue With Terrible Execution Methods?
40 Answers
http:// news.sk y.com/s tory/16 99116/o klahoma -execut ion-off icials- were-ca reless
Read this, I also saw the report on the TV this morning. You'd think they were ordering chemicals for cleaning a carpet. Even when using the right drugs it's a terrible method! Quite breathtaking stupidity! "That sounds the same must be ok" - did they ever touch on chemistry? PS This is about execution methods not the rights and wrongs of executions, start your own thread if you want that.
Read this, I also saw the report on the TV this morning. You'd think they were ordering chemicals for cleaning a carpet. Even when using the right drugs it's a terrible method! Quite breathtaking stupidity! "That sounds the same must be ok" - did they ever touch on chemistry? PS This is about execution methods not the rights and wrongs of executions, start your own thread if you want that.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."[Oklahoma's proposed method] would likely involve placing some type of mask over the condemned inmate’s head and pumping it full of 100 percent nitrogen, thereby depriving that person of oxygen. The inmate would die not by suffocation, which is caused by an inability to exhale and a subsequent (and very painful) buildup of carbon dioxide in the body, but rather by becoming gradually oxygen-deprived, which is essentially painless."
The hypoxia results in a sensation of euphoria and it appears to be the most pain-free method of execution.
The hypoxia results in a sensation of euphoria and it appears to be the most pain-free method of execution.
When folk (such as piilots ) are tested in a decompression chamber they can do tasks that are set for them whilst wearing an oxygen mask but when the mask is removed and pressure drops, the nitrogen level increases. Their ability to follow even simple tasks diminishes and when telt to put on their oxygen mask they are not able to do it and they can often be giggly about it.
According to this article : http:// www.the atlanti c.com/p olitics /archiv e/2015/ 03/gas- chamber s-elect ric-cha irs-and -firing -squads /387706 / , it appears that perhaps European countries play a hand in causing some States here to return to more archaic forms of execution by not supplying certain drugs that were, previously, used in concocting the fatal doses administered to condemned criminals.
Also seems that Triple T's wish for sudden death at the end of a .30 caliber missile travelling at 3,300 feet per second could be in the offing if the State of Utah so chooses.
Ironically for many decades Utah offered the condemned their choice of execution, including firing squad. This was based on the fact that the LDS (Mormon) adherents believed that they could not gain forgiveness and therefore admission to heaven unless they shed their own blood if they had been convicted of murdering someone by a method that caused their victim to have shed their own blood...
Also seems that Triple T's wish for sudden death at the end of a .30 caliber missile travelling at 3,300 feet per second could be in the offing if the State of Utah so chooses.
Ironically for many decades Utah offered the condemned their choice of execution, including firing squad. This was based on the fact that the LDS (Mormon) adherents believed that they could not gain forgiveness and therefore admission to heaven unless they shed their own blood if they had been convicted of murdering someone by a method that caused their victim to have shed their own blood...
The first person to be executed unwillingly was John Spenkelink in 1980. When asked what he thought of capital punishment he replied, "If you ain't got the capital, you get the punishment". This has always struck me as very profound. Dr. Johnson said, "He cannot be hanged who hath £500 at his command".
Naomi - I can see the logic in your point about retribution and punishment - but I fail to see it in the sentencing system itself.
Surely the essence of punishment is to ensure that someone does not do the same thing again - hardly likely if they are rendered deceased - it somewhat removes the element of proof that the punishment is effective.
Retribution - now that is entirely a concept I can understand - but for some reason, the U.S. is singularly coy about its base need to murder someone for murdering someone else.
Surely the essence of punishment is to ensure that someone does not do the same thing again - hardly likely if they are rendered deceased - it somewhat removes the element of proof that the punishment is effective.
Retribution - now that is entirely a concept I can understand - but for some reason, the U.S. is singularly coy about its base need to murder someone for murdering someone else.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.