Motoring4 mins ago
How Safe Are We? 1 In 8 Returning Jihadists Convicted
23 Answers
Surely, this is a failure at a number of levels? We hear constantly of the numerous attacks foiled by our security services but does this ratio concern you?
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 6/05/21 /only-o ne-in-e ight-ji hadists -return ing-to- uk-is-c aught-a nd-conv ic/
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Jno > And even if you catch them, does locking them up make any difference at all?
Even removing them off the streets is no guarantee. (Naomi's recent thread highlighted the 140 imam's appointed to our prison system spouting their doctrines.)
Sadiq Khan, you can dispel some doubters by getting stuck into this issue!!
Even removing them off the streets is no guarantee. (Naomi's recent thread highlighted the 140 imam's appointed to our prison system spouting their doctrines.)
Sadiq Khan, you can dispel some doubters by getting stuck into this issue!!
The 400 figure of people returning is an estimate. A guess. As is the figure of people who went off in the first place. There are no actual figures, so any conclusions based on 54 convictions, is therefore suspect. The Daily Telegraph is running a Strengthen Our Borders Campaign, so they are happy to pass off a story full of made up numbers, as fact, to fit in with their agenda.
Even if the figures are correct, whilst that's an unfortunate ratio is there any indication that practical measures to improve it exist and are presently unused ? Can't be easy to spot undesirables. If the authorities manage to catch those who start behaving badly once they've snuck back in, that's at least a second level of security.
Gromit > The Daily Telegraph is running a Strengthen Our Borders Campaign, so they are happy to pass off a story full of made up numbers, as fact,
A worthy campaign. Whatever the figure is, I suspect the ratio is not wide of the mark. We really don't hear that much about successful convictions do we?
That is something that the British public and the media would want to be aware of and broadcast.
A worthy campaign. Whatever the figure is, I suspect the ratio is not wide of the mark. We really don't hear that much about successful convictions do we?
That is something that the British public and the media would want to be aware of and broadcast.
What do you suggest we do?
UK citizens are free to leave the country and return without any checks. No records are kept of who leaves the country and who returns.
The only solution I can see is to require everyone to register when they leave the country and when they come back.
Are you prepared to give up your right to travel without having to be checked in and out of the UK? Just for a start it would be logistically impossible, imagine every single person leaving or returning to the UK having to be checked through passport control.
UK citizens are free to leave the country and return without any checks. No records are kept of who leaves the country and who returns.
The only solution I can see is to require everyone to register when they leave the country and when they come back.
Are you prepared to give up your right to travel without having to be checked in and out of the UK? Just for a start it would be logistically impossible, imagine every single person leaving or returning to the UK having to be checked through passport control.
They went off to fight a war, which by all accounts, they are losing and suffering heavy casualties. So the fact that not as many are returning than left, is to be expected.
Without knowing how the 400 figures was 'estimated', we should not trust it.
There seems to be an assumption that the Home Office/ Security Services are deliberately being negligent, and not doing their jobs. But why would they do that? Jusging from their response in the article, they are doing everything possible to seek out the returnees. What more can we ask?
Without knowing how the 400 figures was 'estimated', we should not trust it.
There seems to be an assumption that the Home Office/ Security Services are deliberately being negligent, and not doing their jobs. But why would they do that? Jusging from their response in the article, they are doing everything possible to seek out the returnees. What more can we ask?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.