A mail journalist has taken up yards of newsprint in today's edition anthropmorhising this situation, and the gorilla's behaviour, centering in the fact that for a new seconds the gorilla held the child's hand.
This sort of handwringing sob-fest goes against the facts and the potential of the situation -
a large and potentially lethal primate, part of a species known for sudden and unpredictable changes in mood and behaviour is within reach of a small child. The zoo staff had to make an instant decision, and made, in my view, the correct one.
Waiting to see if the gorilla was going to continue 'interacting' with the child, or suddenly tear him limb from limb is a luxury afforded to armchair analysts, none of whom would have been held responsible for the death of the child had they not acted as they did.