Body & Soul5 mins ago
Did The Zoo Officials Make The Correct Decision To Kill The Gorilla?
197 Answers
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/am ericas/ cincinn ati-zoo -critic s-blame -parent s-of-bo y-as-an ger-mou nts-ove r-shoot ing-dea d-of-go rilla-a 7055796 .html
Many have said that they didn't, but what was the alternative?
On a radio phone-in this morning, one person was foolish enough to suggest that the parents of the child staged this, so that they could obtain video footage to later sell to the media and put on youtube.
Many have said that they didn't, but what was the alternative?
On a radio phone-in this morning, one person was foolish enough to suggest that the parents of the child staged this, so that they could obtain video footage to later sell to the media and put on youtube.
Answers
A mail journalist has taken up yards of newsprint in today's edition anthropmorhi sing this situation, and the gorilla's behaviour, centering in the fact that for a new seconds the gorilla held the child's hand. This sort of handwringing sob-fest goes against the facts and the potential of the situation - a large and potentially lethal primate, part of a...
10:50 Tue 31st May 2016
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
A mail journalist has taken up yards of newsprint in today's edition anthropmorhising this situation, and the gorilla's behaviour, centering in the fact that for a new seconds the gorilla held the child's hand.
This sort of handwringing sob-fest goes against the facts and the potential of the situation -
a large and potentially lethal primate, part of a species known for sudden and unpredictable changes in mood and behaviour is within reach of a small child. The zoo staff had to make an instant decision, and made, in my view, the correct one.
Waiting to see if the gorilla was going to continue 'interacting' with the child, or suddenly tear him limb from limb is a luxury afforded to armchair analysts, none of whom would have been held responsible for the death of the child had they not acted as they did.
This sort of handwringing sob-fest goes against the facts and the potential of the situation -
a large and potentially lethal primate, part of a species known for sudden and unpredictable changes in mood and behaviour is within reach of a small child. The zoo staff had to make an instant decision, and made, in my view, the correct one.
Waiting to see if the gorilla was going to continue 'interacting' with the child, or suddenly tear him limb from limb is a luxury afforded to armchair analysts, none of whom would have been held responsible for the death of the child had they not acted as they did.
Gness....I always think back to my MILs story about her two. She's a brilliant mother...
She was shopping with her two kids...she let go of her daughters hand as she went to pay for the goods. Her daughter ran off, mother ran after her leaving son behind....son rides out the shop on a toy car....mother comes back and son is missing. This is where ginger hair is a bonus :-) she desperately looks for her son and a stranger says "are you looking for a ginger kid? because he's up there"
That situation was out of her hands. It all happened in seconds.
In life we have to do things which means we take our eyes off our little ones.
looks
She was shopping with her two kids...she let go of her daughters hand as she went to pay for the goods. Her daughter ran off, mother ran after her leaving son behind....son rides out the shop on a toy car....mother comes back and son is missing. This is where ginger hair is a bonus :-) she desperately looks for her son and a stranger says "are you looking for a ginger kid? because he's up there"
That situation was out of her hands. It all happened in seconds.
In life we have to do things which means we take our eyes off our little ones.
looks
-- answer removed --
I know that, Ummmm...and being fairly local you may know how close I am to the most tragic death of a child through a moment of inattention.
But we have to know our kids and be responsible for them in different situations. I could have taken my four year old daughter to a zoo and know that she'd never leave my side for a second.... I'd have had to have my four year old son on reins or a wrist lead.
But we have to know our kids and be responsible for them in different situations. I could have taken my four year old daughter to a zoo and know that she'd never leave my side for a second.... I'd have had to have my four year old son on reins or a wrist lead.
No, Pied......the money spent is fine with me.......the death of a gorilla isn't.
Anne, I'm not yet convinced of that......if a child got in there the zoo was negligent in protecting the public and damage to the child would have been costly.......that may not, of course, have been their thinking...but it may.
Anne, I'm not yet convinced of that......if a child got in there the zoo was negligent in protecting the public and damage to the child would have been costly.......that may not, of course, have been their thinking...but it may.
The parents are responsible for the child getting into the enclosure.
The zoo would have been responsible if the gorilla killed the child once it was in the enclosure, given they had an opportunity to stop the gorilla doing that.
This interview gives a fair summary of the situation the zoo faced:
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/vi deo_and _audio/ headlin es/3641 3698
The zoo would have been responsible if the gorilla killed the child once it was in the enclosure, given they had an opportunity to stop the gorilla doing that.
This interview gives a fair summary of the situation the zoo faced:
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.