On my screen it says there will be no charges, which goes a bit further than "no further investigation".
He's made a statement which I think all reasonable people would agree with.
Good for him.
In the BBC article it says the Crown Prosecution decided there was insufficient evidence to prosecute. Does that mean they had evidence but not enough or there was no case to answer? I'm confused about the end meaning of that statement.
jordyboy; //There is no smoke without Fire,money talks,a whitewash???//
In that one sentence, you have accused a man of guilt without evidence and suggested that he has bribed his way out of a conviction.
Don't you think you should be ashamed?
I'm thinking the BBC also needs to send Sir Cliff an apology here.
I understand that with historical abuse claims, it's better that the accused is named so that other victims can come forward...but the BBC handled this extremely badly.