ChatterBank8 mins ago
350 Million For The Nhs....
Oh hang on , that figure was a 'mistake'
Yours Sincer...
Mr Farage
Yours Sincer...
Mr Farage
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Farage has said on many occasions that his only purpose was to get a Referendum. We have now had that and the people have voted to leave, so what possible use is there for a Party called The United Kingdom Independence Party ?
There is only one UKIP MP, and it isn't Farage, so its doesn't really matter either way I suppose.
But the Party itself has now made itself redundant !
There is only one UKIP MP, and it isn't Farage, so its doesn't really matter either way I suppose.
But the Party itself has now made itself redundant !
The Labour party has an existential crisis on its hands. They were founded on the principle of protecting the labour force from the might of industrialists. They are powerless when faced with protecting workers from an over-supply of additional workers, under the simple law of supply and demand determining pay rates. (ie any influx of workers (race/nationality immaterial) with which the indigenous workers must compete makes workplace conditions tougher and hands power to the employer).
UKIP could take the populist route and claim to serve workers rights but, being generally to the right of vanilla Tories, this should be anathema to them.
Equally, a Labourite who ditched them to support UKIP has to be the kind of person who allows a single issue to overcome all their instinctive hatred of a group who are mostly ex-Tories.
All rather puzzling.
UKIP could take the populist route and claim to serve workers rights but, being generally to the right of vanilla Tories, this should be anathema to them.
Equally, a Labourite who ditched them to support UKIP has to be the kind of person who allows a single issue to overcome all their instinctive hatred of a group who are mostly ex-Tories.
All rather puzzling.
It was never a mistake, it was the subscription we were to pay to the EU barring any temporary discounts. And to the best of my knowledge it was never promised to be spent on the NHS. Not paying the subscription means there will as be money available for Westminster to allocate where it wishes. Or at least will be when everything has settled down.
If you want all savings to all go to the NHS (a mistake in my opinion as there are many existing grants we would probably be wise to keep going) then at the next election vote for an MP who promises to push and vote for that.
If you want all savings to all go to the NHS (a mistake in my opinion as there are many existing grants we would probably be wise to keep going) then at the next election vote for an MP who promises to push and vote for that.