Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 38rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have never been so confident that those two ,in particular, will ever be released .
I don't want to go down the hang 'em high route as I'd rather they'd live the rest of their miserable lives ,without each other, in a torturous existence.
One would hope not - 'Cruel and pitiless' are the politest terms to describe their actions.

Hopefully the other children with the love and care of another family or families may in some way go on to have happy lives.
they'll get out at some point when some Lord Longford type geezer starts telling what nice people they are.
I would have preferred 30 years at least, but I suppose it's better than a mamby pamby 15 !!
evil pair of .."female dogs " ...surviving kids are lucky to have the chance of a life now...
I doubt they'll survive the length of their jail term
with any luck Albs...
we can only hope Minty
am not a great fan of slaughter but when it comes to those two, I'll look the other way
and am not proud of saying that
ditto ^^
Unfortunately such vile creatures do exist, I can't post what I really think of them. They are safer behind bars for their own safety if I had my way. However my heart goes out to the surviving youngsters.
SHOULD never be released, but once they've served their minimum time, who knows? We might have a Merlin Rees-type Home Secretary 24 years from now
They do not deserve to be released, what they did is pure evil. I would look the other way too alba.
I think that they should be locked up and the key thrown away. The horrors that they subjected that little boy too were absolutely disgusting.

But I must also say the 23.5 years and 24 years seems like a very strong sentence for me and its likely that these two will die in prison.
Here we go again!
It is simply not possible to sentence them to a 'whole life term' no matter how bad the crime. They have been given 'life' with the maximum possible tariff of 24 years for one of them and a tariff just 6 months short of the maximum for the other.
As I always have to point out on these occasions they have NOT been sentenced to 23.5 or 24 years, they have been sentenced to 'life'.
The tariff is just the minimum time that has to pass before they can even start the process of applying for release on licence. It will take several more years after the tariff time to actually put in the first request for release and then more time for it to be considered. I agree that these two will almost certainly never be released .
AOG

It's certainly shocking - and goes against the natural order. Parents are supposed to be the guardians of their charge's well-being. Not the architects of their deaths.

I'm reminded of this particularly gruesome story from a couple of weeks ago:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36587103

Why the hell would someone battle for the custody of their child, and then kill them?

Is this becoming more prevalent, or are we simply more attuned to it?
EDDIE51

My assumption is that these two will be treated like the Moors Murderers. Whilst they don't have a life term, they effectively do have a life term because the chances of any Home Secretary releasing them is ultra-thin.

Good.
SP...what I am concerned about is the role of the authorities in all of this.

All of these terrible deaths were 100% avoidable....How many more Victoria Climbié's or Daniel Pelka's are we going to have, before the authorities pull their fingers out ?
Eddie, //It is simply not possible to sentence them to a 'whole life term' no matter how bad the crime.//

That doesn't appear to be right. Here's a list of people who were sentenced to whole life tariffs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prisoners_with_whole-life_tariffs

sp1814. Believe me I have not a shred of sympathy for these evil people!
It is just that every time there is a case similar to this reported we get the same outraged protest about 'Idiot Judges' 'lenient sentences' and demands that they be locked up for ever. When the truth is that a Judge can only sentence according to the law, no matter what the circumstances.
The 'tariff' is always quoted as the date the offender will be released, and not as what it actually is, the minimum time that has to pass before the offender can even begin the process of applying for parole.
Finally 'Life' really does mean LIFE, contrary to the popular view on AB.
An offender sentenced to 'life' can only ever be 'released on licence'. The life sentence remains in place and can be reactivated at any time if the licence conditions are not complied with. They can be recalled to jail without a further trial or conviction.

1 to 20 of 38rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Surely These Two Evil Creatures Should Never Be Released?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.