Society & Culture2 mins ago
What Further Sentence Should This Man Get?
22 Answers
I'd like to see him go down for the rest of his life. I dont see how he could ever be considered safe again.
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
YMB - //Get a good Judge all is fine, get one you your like minded liberal Judges and we get a poor sentence. //
I have taken the necessary time to retrieve my temper from orbit at the inference that I would think the same as any judge who would give this creature a lenient sentence.
Now I can confirm that I am in the same position as you - relying on a judge to exercise the law to its fullest extent.
It is what any rational person would want - I thought it so obvious as to not need to be pointed out.
To you, it appears it does need to be pointed out - consider it done.
I have taken the necessary time to retrieve my temper from orbit at the inference that I would think the same as any judge who would give this creature a lenient sentence.
Now I can confirm that I am in the same position as you - relying on a judge to exercise the law to its fullest extent.
It is what any rational person would want - I thought it so obvious as to not need to be pointed out.
To you, it appears it does need to be pointed out - consider it done.
Yes, he has confessed. But he is highly unlikely to ever leave prison ::::
http://
He has spent the last few years in Prison, here and abroad. I recall him being interviewed and have the gall to say that he wasn't at fault in anyway at all.....it was the unfair laws in some countries that prevented him from having sex with young boys !
What a pity that his equally odious friend, Johnathan King isn't in prison with him.
http://
He has spent the last few years in Prison, here and abroad. I recall him being interviewed and have the gall to say that he wasn't at fault in anyway at all.....it was the unfair laws in some countries that prevented him from having sex with young boys !
What a pity that his equally odious friend, Johnathan King isn't in prison with him.
youngmafbog . You are incorrect . The Judge is constrained by what sentence the law allows! The Judge has to start with the sentence guide lines and adjust the sentence according to the situation. There is a minimum and a maximum sentence for any offence.
In the case of murder only there is just one possible sentence and that is 'Life'. In a life sentence the judge will also give a 'tariff' this is the minimum time that must be served before the prisoner can start the process of applying for parole.
However for this offence 'life' is not a possible sentence. So no matter what the judge feels about the case or how liberal, hard or soft the judge is he/she can not sentence to life.
The offender has already got another 10 years of his original sentence to serve, under the rules he will now serve that entire sentence with out parole. As he is already 75 he will not be out until he is 85 anyway.
Then there is the rule that in the UK sentences are served concurrently so any new sentence that is given for this offence will be served along side the original sentence. Again the judge has no choice in this as it is a point of law not a matter for the judge. I do not know the maximum sentence for this offence but let us assume it is 20 years. If the judge sentences to 20 years the offender will still be serving the remaining 10 years of his original sentence concurrently with what ever he gets for this offence.
He may still be out in 10 years and there is nothing the Judge can do about it. But realistically this man is going to have no hope of release until around 87 and it is virtually certain you will get your wish to see him die in jail.
I just wish people would get rid of this idea that a Judge decides what sentence to give, it is just not true! If it were you could get a sentence of 2 years to life for the same offence depending on how the judge was feeling on the day!
In the case of murder only there is just one possible sentence and that is 'Life'. In a life sentence the judge will also give a 'tariff' this is the minimum time that must be served before the prisoner can start the process of applying for parole.
However for this offence 'life' is not a possible sentence. So no matter what the judge feels about the case or how liberal, hard or soft the judge is he/she can not sentence to life.
The offender has already got another 10 years of his original sentence to serve, under the rules he will now serve that entire sentence with out parole. As he is already 75 he will not be out until he is 85 anyway.
Then there is the rule that in the UK sentences are served concurrently so any new sentence that is given for this offence will be served along side the original sentence. Again the judge has no choice in this as it is a point of law not a matter for the judge. I do not know the maximum sentence for this offence but let us assume it is 20 years. If the judge sentences to 20 years the offender will still be serving the remaining 10 years of his original sentence concurrently with what ever he gets for this offence.
He may still be out in 10 years and there is nothing the Judge can do about it. But realistically this man is going to have no hope of release until around 87 and it is virtually certain you will get your wish to see him die in jail.
I just wish people would get rid of this idea that a Judge decides what sentence to give, it is just not true! If it were you could get a sentence of 2 years to life for the same offence depending on how the judge was feeling on the day!
