Talbot - //Anyone who has an opposing argument to yours has a flawed argument, I think over the years that has become crystal clear. //
That is neither true, nor something I say simply because a view is different from mine.
You have reached a conclusion based on a single observation. I believe it to be illogical, and I have given you an equal scenario to illustrate why your conclusion is invalid.
If you want to snipe at me, then fine, but I would rather you debated the point - if you have anything to say further.
I have read many times that the burka is a symbol of oppression not from Christians or white people but from Muslim women ( many of whom also think the same of other Islamic head attire) //
I have read many times that there is a Santa Claus - it doesn't mean that simply because I have read it a few times, it is a fact, and I will accept it without challenge.
//The incident I mentioned was the first time I had seen the oppression in action and quite frankly I thought it was sickening to observe. //
Again, I am not disputing what you saw - my argument is with your assumption that what you saw, measured against your western mind set is 'oppression', and that it represents the situation for all Muslim women.
All I am saying is that one situation without any explanation does not constitute an entire cultural outlook - simply that I question the notion of 'oppression' based on seeing this one situation.
We can agree to differ, but just as you are entitled to forward your thoughts and conclusions, so I am entitled to challenge them.