Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Sell The Palace Of Westminster....
26 Answers
...and move parliament to manchester....
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-manch ester-3 7320450
makes sense doesn't it? the current building is falling down but if sold to developers it'd be worth billions as luxury apartments and the government wouldn't be saddled with the repair cost. plus if parliament were moved to a big shed warehouse site near the M6, it would be 100% more accessible to many more visitors, as well as being easy to get to for MPs and civil servants alike.
win win, surely?
http://
makes sense doesn't it? the current building is falling down but if sold to developers it'd be worth billions as luxury apartments and the government wouldn't be saddled with the repair cost. plus if parliament were moved to a big shed warehouse site near the M6, it would be 100% more accessible to many more visitors, as well as being easy to get to for MPs and civil servants alike.
win win, surely?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Daft idea. Our government is a result of years of history and needs a palace that links to that and does it justice. Not some modern block miles from the capital city.
Mind you, if the price was "right" I wouldn't put it past a Tory government to sell it off. Probably find a private office tower block at lowest rent to use instead.
Mind you, if the price was "right" I wouldn't put it past a Tory government to sell it off. Probably find a private office tower block at lowest rent to use instead.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Quite seriously, it would be good for the country if Parliament moved out of London and understood the rest of its responsibilities better.
I would suggest Birmingham or Sheffield as being more central and directly on the M1. On the whole I would pick Sheffield because Birmingham is already horribly huge and Sheffield has room to expand near to the M1.
The current Palace of Westminster could still house Government Departments and keep its tourist status. n Another advantage is that 'Halls of Residence' could be built reasonable cheaply near to Sheffield (or Birmingham) and thereby do away with the vexed '2nd home expenses' question. Sitting MPs would have a right to a 2-bed flat on site and anything else is at their expense.
I would suggest Birmingham or Sheffield as being more central and directly on the M1. On the whole I would pick Sheffield because Birmingham is already horribly huge and Sheffield has room to expand near to the M1.
The current Palace of Westminster could still house Government Departments and keep its tourist status. n Another advantage is that 'Halls of Residence' could be built reasonable cheaply near to Sheffield (or Birmingham) and thereby do away with the vexed '2nd home expenses' question. Sitting MPs would have a right to a 2-bed flat on site and anything else is at their expense.
Be it The Palace of Westminster or Whitehall, both are not fit for purpose. No modernisation, retro fit, or restoration is going to make these workspaces condusive to a modern business environment. So spending £4billion on the wrong building is a complete waste of money.
The voting chamber should remain in the capital, but there is no reason the many Government departments cannot be redistributed to every edge of the UK. Electronic communication means that expensive office space in London is a gross waste of money. The job can be done in the regions, cheaper and equally as efficient.
The voting chamber should remain in the capital, but there is no reason the many Government departments cannot be redistributed to every edge of the UK. Electronic communication means that expensive office space in London is a gross waste of money. The job can be done in the regions, cheaper and equally as efficient.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --