Shopping & Style0 min ago
What Should Black People In America Do, To Avoid Being Killed By Police Officers?
Last month, we found out that being a professional psychologist lying flat on the ground doesn't stop bullets, and now being a pastor with hands raised doesn't work either:
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/am ericas/ terence -crutch er-fata lly-sho t-by-tu lsa-pol ice-a73 17531.h tml
As these gentlemen weren't gangsters, exactly what should black people do now?
http://
As these gentlemen weren't gangsters, exactly what should black people do now?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
More uncomfortable truths, please don't read if you are over sensitive to such figures.
/// Conversely, on average, there were 96 black males who are killed by white police officers each year – and another 300 white males who are killed by police officers according to FBI statistics. ///
/// Then there’s this… There were 431 black killers of “whites” in 2014, compared to 193 “white” killers of blacks while blacks make up only 13% of the national population. There were approximately 6,000 black on black murders last year. ///
http:// www.the gateway pundit. com/201 5/04/sh ock-rep ort-mor e-law-e nforcem ent-off icers-k illed-e ach-yea r-than- young-b lack-me n-by-wh ite-cop s/
/// Conversely, on average, there were 96 black males who are killed by white police officers each year – and another 300 white males who are killed by police officers according to FBI statistics. ///
/// Then there’s this… There were 431 black killers of “whites” in 2014, compared to 193 “white” killers of blacks while blacks make up only 13% of the national population. There were approximately 6,000 black on black murders last year. ///
http://
ummmm
/// Why can't they shoot to wound if they're that twitchy? It's not like there wasn't enough of them.. ///
You only see that type of things in the movies, if you have had any firearms training, which obviously you haven't, one is taught to aim your fire at your targets largest body mass, especially if one is using a hand held weapon.
/// Why can't they shoot to wound if they're that twitchy? It's not like there wasn't enough of them.. ///
You only see that type of things in the movies, if you have had any firearms training, which obviously you haven't, one is taught to aim your fire at your targets largest body mass, especially if one is using a hand held weapon.
-- answer removed --
For your first stat to be meaningful we'd also need to know how much bigger the white population is than the black population.
For the second statistic you haven't mentioned the white on white statistics, although maybe that's in the article.
Policing is indeed very tough, and a matter of life and death for officers, but officers who get twitchy when holding a gun and see a black man are dangerous and maybe need counselling/help
For the second statistic you haven't mentioned the white on white statistics, although maybe that's in the article.
Policing is indeed very tough, and a matter of life and death for officers, but officers who get twitchy when holding a gun and see a black man are dangerous and maybe need counselling/help
divebuddy
He was shot because the police thought he may have been reaching for a gun. If he had done what he was told he wouldn't have got shot.
Hmmm...that magical invisible gun that floats in the air just out of reach of someone with their hands up.
I completely understand when police are faced with what they think is a potentially dangerous individual, but surely this pastor is along the same lines as the black psychologist who was lying on the ground with his hands outstretched saying "Please don't shoot me"...shortly before being shot.
Seriously...the fella was out in a parking lot trying to calm down a mental patient!
The problem as I see it (proved by some of the responses here) is that it matters not what black people in the US do - no matter whether they are law-abiding professionals who act in accordance with police instructions, some will justify their execution based on the fact that they are black.
That is really quite disturbing.
He was shot because the police thought he may have been reaching for a gun. If he had done what he was told he wouldn't have got shot.
Hmmm...that magical invisible gun that floats in the air just out of reach of someone with their hands up.
I completely understand when police are faced with what they think is a potentially dangerous individual, but surely this pastor is along the same lines as the black psychologist who was lying on the ground with his hands outstretched saying "Please don't shoot me"...shortly before being shot.
Seriously...the fella was out in a parking lot trying to calm down a mental patient!
The problem as I see it (proved by some of the responses here) is that it matters not what black people in the US do - no matter whether they are law-abiding professionals who act in accordance with police instructions, some will justify their execution based on the fact that they are black.
That is really quite disturbing.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
They are concerning but not really a surprise in that they confirm that offending (or being caught) rates are quite a lot higher for blacks than for white.
But they are not relevant to this case and do not justify shooting a black man on the grounds that there is a one in 100 chance he is a killer rather than the perhaps 1 in 150 chance if he was white
But they are not relevant to this case and do not justify shooting a black man on the grounds that there is a one in 100 chance he is a killer rather than the perhaps 1 in 150 chance if he was white
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
divebuddy
As disturbing as the over-representation of ex-servicemen incarcerated in the US and UK.
What we need to do is look at the reasons behind these figures, rather than reaching any conclusions based on the headline figures. We need to ask, "Why is there an over-representation", rather than using the figure to prove something that is arguably unsupportable.
As disturbing as the over-representation of ex-servicemen incarcerated in the US and UK.
What we need to do is look at the reasons behind these figures, rather than reaching any conclusions based on the headline figures. We need to ask, "Why is there an over-representation", rather than using the figure to prove something that is arguably unsupportable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.