"the admiration is usualy taken out of context. "
That, surely, is the point! I would like to hear some of these people (Trump, Evans, Farage) etc define "admiration" because I have a feeling that if you forced a bit of "context" into the equation there would be no admiration
Boris Johnson has changed his tune a bit since he became Foreign Secretary
There is a lot of info on how the launcher came into Russia, and indeed from where it was fired. There was only one route from Russia to the point of firing, and only one side who could have fired it once it was there.
Even if the missile came from Ukraine (which it plainly did not) I don't see how that absolves them from firing it (!)
There is piles of other damning evidence (the phone transcripts, (remember those?) where they admit firing it, and the hastily removed Twitter feed.. The only question is how much of it is admissible.
As for "the defence" well as I said above, we had that earlier in the week from Rubbish Today and other sources
https://www.rt.com/news/360634-mh17-ukraine-radar-data/
Note from that:
"This contradicts the scenario maintained by Kiev, under which a Buk missile could have been fired from the rebel-controlled village of Snezhnoye. "
Except it is not "Kiev" that maintains that but everyone who has investigated this to date who is not desperately involved in a cover-up :-)
In fact it actually contradicts their earlier nonsense about "evidence" they had that a Ukrainian fighter plane had been in the area and that the airliner had mysteriously changed directed etc etc