Crosswords2 mins ago
Breaking News.
47 Answers
Pauline cafferkey admitted to hospital again :-(
Answers
http://
20:03 Thu 06th Oct 2016
AOG - //Whenever Pauline Cafferkey, is up for discussion, it is not unusual for her selfish and dangerous actions to be brought into the conversation.
Because of those actions, we could be discussing more than just one persons particular illnesses derived from this dreadful lethal disease. //
I refer you to my post at 14:00 - Ms Cafferkey was judged not to have behaved in a selfish and / or irresponsible manner by her disciplinary hearing - have you had another hearing all on your own since?
Because of those actions, we could be discussing more than just one persons particular illnesses derived from this dreadful lethal disease. //
I refer you to my post at 14:00 - Ms Cafferkey was judged not to have behaved in a selfish and / or irresponsible manner by her disciplinary hearing - have you had another hearing all on your own since?
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - //I don't remember the disciplinary hearing saying that she acted in a non-selfish and responsible way.. //
Neither do I, because that is not what they said, and that is not what I said either.
My post says - // I refer you to my post at 14:00 - Ms Cafferkey was judged not to have behaved in a selfish and / or irresponsible manner by her disciplinary hearing -... //
Saying that someone has not behaved in an irresponsible way is absolutely not the same as saying that they have behaved in a responsible way.
The tribunal did not conclude that, I did not say that - you have reached a conclusion which is without foundation or accuracy.
// Rather the opposite. It was just that her brain was a bit scrambled at the time and she didn't really know what she was doing. So, she was deemed not responsible for her actions (which were wrong, of course). //
That is true, and I don't dispute it.
Neither do I, because that is not what they said, and that is not what I said either.
My post says - // I refer you to my post at 14:00 - Ms Cafferkey was judged not to have behaved in a selfish and / or irresponsible manner by her disciplinary hearing -... //
Saying that someone has not behaved in an irresponsible way is absolutely not the same as saying that they have behaved in a responsible way.
The tribunal did not conclude that, I did not say that - you have reached a conclusion which is without foundation or accuracy.
// Rather the opposite. It was just that her brain was a bit scrambled at the time and she didn't really know what she was doing. So, she was deemed not responsible for her actions (which were wrong, of course). //
That is true, and I don't dispute it.
I don't think that anyone can dispute the fact that if someone knowingly has a temperature ,which is a very real indicator of a deadly disease, enters the country and deliberately masks that condition , thereby threatening the lives of many hundreds of thousands , has acted in a highly irresponsible manner..regardless of what any subsequent jury decides..facts speak.....
murraymints - //I don't think that anyone can dispute the fact that if someone knowingly has a temperature ,which is a very real indicator of a deadly disease, enters the country and deliberately masks that condition , thereby threatening the lives of many hundreds of thousands , has acted in a highly irresponsible manner..regardless of what any subsequent jury decides..facts speak..... //
They key word is 'deliberately'.
Ms. Cafferkey was judged not to have masked her condition deliberately - so you would be wrong in judging her to be highly irresponsible.
They key word is 'deliberately'.
Ms. Cafferkey was judged not to have masked her condition deliberately - so you would be wrong in judging her to be highly irresponsible.
a trained nurse would know that taking paracetamol would temporarily bring one's temp down....! even I know that.....the tribunal's outcome to my mind was based on avoiding a national and public scandal versus the good intentions of a volunteer going out there in the first place...a misguided outcome at best....many NHS professionals that I know have poured scorn on that outcome... and to say she did not do it intentionally is somewhat disingenuous
murraymints - //a trained nurse would know that taking paracetamol would temporarily bring one's temp down....! even I know that.....the tribunal's outcome to my mind was based on avoiding a national and public scandal versus the good intentions of a volunteer going out there in the first place...a misguided outcome at best....many NHS professionals that I know have poured scorn on that outcome... and to say she did not do it intentionally is somewhat disingenuous //
If you want to second-guess Ms Cafferkey's mental state at the time she took the medication, and then second-guess the reasons for the tribunal's decision based on evidence that neither you or I have heard, then go right ahead, but you may not find much traction with that view by anyone who looks at the facts as they are known to the public.
If you want to second-guess Ms Cafferkey's mental state at the time she took the medication, and then second-guess the reasons for the tribunal's decision based on evidence that neither you or I have heard, then go right ahead, but you may not find much traction with that view by anyone who looks at the facts as they are known to the public.
