ChatterBank1 min ago
How Many Arms Does An Octopus Have......?
46 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/el ection- us-2016 -376398 39
Apparently they have 6 armed octopuses in the US! PMSL!
Apparently they have 6 armed octopuses in the US! PMSL!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Obviously these are only allegations and could be made-up. But the dismissive attitude is appalling, particularly given what Trump is known to have said and boasted about doing.
It's typical and disgustingly small-minded to dismiss the allegations either because of length of time or because of some naive and utterly misguided assumption that clearly it would have been mentioned at the time had it been real. We know this is not true when it comes to sexual assaults, rape, domestic violence, etc. Positions of power and intimidation can effectively enforce silence; or the complaints are not taken seriously at the time; or some more active conspiracy of silence keeping victims gagged.
As to "the she-devil"... Show some respect and call Hillary Clinton by her name.
It's typical and disgustingly small-minded to dismiss the allegations either because of length of time or because of some naive and utterly misguided assumption that clearly it would have been mentioned at the time had it been real. We know this is not true when it comes to sexual assaults, rape, domestic violence, etc. Positions of power and intimidation can effectively enforce silence; or the complaints are not taken seriously at the time; or some more active conspiracy of silence keeping victims gagged.
As to "the she-devil"... Show some respect and call Hillary Clinton by her name.
I don't believe he's guilty of these alleged crimes until he's tried for them in a court of law, which is unlikely to happen (or perhaps even impossible due to limitations that I believe apply in US law). On the other hand I don't think it's right to suppress them given the context. Here's a man who is running for president, in part with a promise to throw his opposing candidate in jail for her own alleged crimes -- which, it should be noted, have been heavily investigated with no criminal proceedings resulting -- and who was recorded on tape boasting about how he happily "grabs [women] by the pussy" whenever he feels like it. His defence to this was that it was all talk, or normal banter. Well, in that case, these allegations are entirely relevant because they go against that line of defence.
And since the women involved (if their allegations are true) may well have no option in law, where else can they go? Or should they be obliged to be silent because how dare they speak out about things that happened to them?
Yes it could be lies, and it's difficult to know how to respond in that case, but the possibility that these separate allegations could be true demands at least some attention.
And since the women involved (if their allegations are true) may well have no option in law, where else can they go? Or should they be obliged to be silent because how dare they speak out about things that happened to them?
Yes it could be lies, and it's difficult to know how to respond in that case, but the possibility that these separate allegations could be true demands at least some attention.
No, not really. I agree that the timing is convenient politically if you are against Trump, but there's no more likely time for the allegations of sexual assault to emerge than soon after a video has emerged showing Trump bragging about effectively committing sexual assault.
Either the video gave the women in question the confidence or the urge to speak out, or it gave them a convenient opportunity to make stuff up if you believe that, but it isn't odd at all either way that the allegations are surfacing now.
Either the video gave the women in question the confidence or the urge to speak out, or it gave them a convenient opportunity to make stuff up if you believe that, but it isn't odd at all either way that the allegations are surfacing now.
anneasquith. // it is because he denied ever sexually assaulting anyone in the past , when they know he is telling lies. //
Could be. On the other hand they could just be jumping on the bandwagon to stick the boot in, as so many others are doing. It just seems strange to me that none of them appear to have complained sooner.
Could be. On the other hand they could just be jumping on the bandwagon to stick the boot in, as so many others are doing. It just seems strange to me that none of them appear to have complained sooner.
"It just seems strange to me that none of them appear to have complained sooner."
It's not untypical of historical sex assault allegations -- one goes back as far as the 1980s, and in general we know now that there was a sad history of such incidents that went unreported because of fear, embarrassment, intimidation or general scepticism discouraging women from reporting it. This may be spinning a narrative to make the abuse more plausible, it may be falling for a lie, I don't know. All I can say is that Trump has bragged about what amounts to committing sexual assault on multiple women, so it would fit into that narrative very well. There can be no doubt at least that the allegations are plausible given the character of the man. He has denied them all, of course, and as long as these aren't tested in a court of law he has to be regarded as innocent of the specific allegations.
One thing worth stressing though is that this isn't something that came up just now. The two most famous would be a litigation for sexual assault in 1997, eventually settled without the allegations being proven; a lawsuit filed earlier this year and due to be heard in December and relating to alleged rape of a 13-year-old; Donald Trump's ex-wife Ivana complained about being "violated" during their marriage in the early 1990s. I could go on and find every case, but in summary women have been complaining about Trump's behaviour for years and years and years.
It's not untypical of historical sex assault allegations -- one goes back as far as the 1980s, and in general we know now that there was a sad history of such incidents that went unreported because of fear, embarrassment, intimidation or general scepticism discouraging women from reporting it. This may be spinning a narrative to make the abuse more plausible, it may be falling for a lie, I don't know. All I can say is that Trump has bragged about what amounts to committing sexual assault on multiple women, so it would fit into that narrative very well. There can be no doubt at least that the allegations are plausible given the character of the man. He has denied them all, of course, and as long as these aren't tested in a court of law he has to be regarded as innocent of the specific allegations.
One thing worth stressing though is that this isn't something that came up just now. The two most famous would be a litigation for sexual assault in 1997, eventually settled without the allegations being proven; a lawsuit filed earlier this year and due to be heard in December and relating to alleged rape of a 13-year-old; Donald Trump's ex-wife Ivana complained about being "violated" during their marriage in the early 1990s. I could go on and find every case, but in summary women have been complaining about Trump's behaviour for years and years and years.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.