Donate SIGN UP

Loose Women - An Apology To Ched Evans

Avatar Image
andy-hughes | 10:51 Fri 21st Oct 2016 | News
65 Answers
Following comments on Loose Women by Gloria Hunniford about Ched Evans, ITV have issued an apology - and Ms. Hunniford is reported to be incandescent with rage, although ITV deny this.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3857342/Gloria-Hunniford-left-humiliated-ITV-says-sorry-Ched-Evans-sex-education-jibe.html


Personally, I think ITV were wrong to apologise - what does anyone else think?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 65rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
She should have known better.

As has been said above it will be interesting to see what she does should be be served with a writ since looking at the clip she is on very shaky ground.

Pixie, //he would have to prove that she would send her grandchildren to him to say that's wrong.//

I think you’ll find it works the other way around. She’s making the accusation and therefore the onus is upon her to prove it’s validity. You know how the law works. Innocent until proven guilty - and all that. She was out of order.
She isn't. She is giving an opinion there- she doesn't have to prove it. If he wanted to sue her for slander- he would have to prove she was lying.
Sensitive souls, these professional footballers!
Pixie, it's an opinion she shouldn't be broadcasting - and if he sued she would have to prove it.
She can broadcast opinions. That's her job. She just can't misrepresent facts- which is where she went wrong. What would she have to prove? That she wouldn't send her grandchildren to him?
Her opinion does not matter, right or wrong. The Evans family are not bothered about her opinion and are getting legal about that.
They are objecting to falsehoods that she used before expressing her opinion.
In a legal case you must not misrepresent the facts. If you do, you can be sued.
If I were to say "Marks & Spencer would be the last shop that I would by my clothes from", would that also be libellous?
Exactly, gromit. No, aog.
If you said their clothes all fall apart-then that could be. Or slander- if it's spoken, instead of written
But only if it isn't true....
Pixie, she is, in effect, saying that he can't be trusted not to lead children astray, and broadcasting derogatory opinions about people without justification is defamation of character. Not nice.
Some parents are fussy who they leave their children with.
^Quite right too.
who?
Not nice-but perfectly fair. I agree with her.
I disagree that it's fair. As I said, many who fallen foul of stupid and, in retrospect, regrettable moments, could, if they're honest, very easily be tarred with the Gloria Hunniford's wide-sweeping brush.
*who have*
Loose tongue from a loose woman. The man was found not guilty whether we like not. She was wrong.
She responded when he was found guilty!!!

41 to 60 of 65rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Loose Women - An Apology To Ched Evans

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.