Being hung drawn and quartered is too good for this man but being realistc surely the death penalty, after a reasonable amount of time behnd bars thinking about the impending outcome.
There is no way he should be allowed to live; evil beyond words.
YMB - it's a strange question because anyone with a normal sense of justice accepts that the legal system is in place to deal with issues like this.
Getting all pumped up into a red mist with a vivid imagination does nothing helpful for anyone - it simply gives the individual an over-developed sense of self-righteousness, and a bad dose of blood pressure.
He has got 'life' what more do you want?
Brady is still alive, yes, but he is constantly pleading to be allowed to commit suicide as he finds life in jail is worse than death.
An entire lifetime being locked away is a fate FAR worse than death and many 'lifers' feel the same. I have worked inside a prison and talked 1 to 1 with several murderers at least half of them said they would rather have had the death sentence!
EDDIE - It appears that the thrust of YMB's OP - and I am of course open to correction - is that we should all be flooded with gallons of self-righteousness, and be moved to dream up all manner of inventive tortures for the convicted man to endure.
I remain unsure why any civilised person would feel that way, but I am always open to explanation.
RandyMarsh - if you can find a connection between inviting people to contribute their favourite torture punishments for a convicted murderer with me pointing out some facts about a deceased radio personality, I am sitting here with baited breath waiting for you to run it by me.
RandyMarsh - I would not wish to put words in your mouth, but are you suggesting that my pointing out that Sir Jimmy Young had a nasty side to him was not 'civilised'?
you want the moral high ground here on this thread and spout about civilised behaviour yet on another thread you are quite happy to speak ill of the dead.
Speaking ill of the dead the day they die is uncivilised and not what gentlemen do.
If you want to take issue with my comments about Sir Jimmy Young, then the thread debating that is the place to do it, not cross-posting on here and causing confusion.
As to what 'a gentleman' does - this is not the foyer of White's in Mayfair in 1917 - I will express my opinions as I wish, and I am not remotely interested in whether or not you think I am 'a gentleman' or not for doing so.