News0 min ago
Mh370 New Theory
What do you think? It is, a possibility.
http:// www.huf fington post.co .uk/ent ry/mh37 0-new-t heory-s uggests -crash- was-an- act-of- heroism -not-hi jacking _uk_582 af08be4 b0e18d1 1a67f4b ?ncid=n ewsltuk new0000 0001
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chrissa1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It was on the mail online http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-39 36620/W as-Mala ysia-Ai rlines- MH370-d isaster -act-he roism.h tml
"What do you think? It is, a possibility"
There are a million possibilities but without proof anyone of those could be plausible.
Will those theorists not leave this story and they families of the victims alone until we KNOW what happened?
So one minute some of us are believing that it was a heinous crime commited by the pilot and now it was possibly heroic selfless act?
"“Given the situation I believe that the pilot then elected to do what many pilots in stricken airplanes have done in the past; steer it clear of populated areas.”
Really? If I was a pilot I'd rather not admit it was the end of my life and steer the plane into the furthest, deepest and unpopulated parts of the ocean but try and crash land in a busy part of the sea with the hope that we may survive and that help could get to us quickly
It's no wonder with headlines/Articles like these those that use the media as a benchmark of what is happening in the world are left confused, perplexed and in a constant state of mass hysteria, highs and lows.
There are a million possibilities but without proof anyone of those could be plausible.
Will those theorists not leave this story and they families of the victims alone until we KNOW what happened?
So one minute some of us are believing that it was a heinous crime commited by the pilot and now it was possibly heroic selfless act?
"“Given the situation I believe that the pilot then elected to do what many pilots in stricken airplanes have done in the past; steer it clear of populated areas.”
Really? If I was a pilot I'd rather not admit it was the end of my life and steer the plane into the furthest, deepest and unpopulated parts of the ocean but try and crash land in a busy part of the sea with the hope that we may survive and that help could get to us quickly
It's no wonder with headlines/Articles like these those that use the media as a benchmark of what is happening in the world are left confused, perplexed and in a constant state of mass hysteria, highs and lows.
"At the first sign of smoke, a burning smell or a fire the crew's initial reaction would have been to don their oxygen masks" No it wouldn't. And then the enthusiast goes on to say that the pilot would have got out of his seat to get a fire extinguisher. That might have been a bit difficult being that he was attached to his oxy mask which is not portable. You only use a BCF for fire - not smoke or fumes. BCF only works on fire as it changes the chemical composition of the fire. If the fire was really bad, the pilot would have donned a smoke hood. You don`t use an oxygen mask in a fire - oxygen is the last thing that you need. If a windscreen heater failed, the circuit breaker would have tripped and if there had been a fire, the pilot would probably have called the cabin crew to deal with it while he got on with flying the plane.
237SJ in the event of fire or smoke the first thing that happens is the Oxygen masks deploy automatically and the crew put them on. The crew can take off the masks to move around the aircraft if necessary. The masks do not give out Oxygen unless the wearer breathes in and inhales otherwise the Oxygen is turned off.
Lunol, the location of the main wreckage is unlikely ever to be found, so we will almost certainly never know for sure what happened . ( It is thought to be in the deepest part of the Pacific over 9,000 ft deep & beyond any possible recovery method)
Lunol, the location of the main wreckage is unlikely ever to be found, so we will almost certainly never know for sure what happened . ( It is thought to be in the deepest part of the Pacific over 9,000 ft deep & beyond any possible recovery method)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.