I would suggest that it is unthinkable that the UK would not invite an elected President of the U.S. for a state visit at the earliest opportunity. The continuity concerns the alliances between the two nations, not the credentials of the individuals holding office at the time.
"Like it or not Mr Trump is the democratically elected President of the USA. " - ooooo! that will upset the lefties, they hate democracy when it gives the "wrong" answers.
If King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia can be invited for a State Visit, why shouldn't the President of the United States be invited for a State Visit, in fact it should never have been debated in the house?
The 'special relationship' Bazile had a lot to do with intelligence gathering. What has intelligence got to do with .... ?
Guess I'd better shut up :-)
The far reich really shouldn't be approving as he's a foreigner and the next thing you'll know he'll be grabbing all of our women, buying all of our golf courses etc..
Indeed they did. But that was before he was elected as the next President. People in the UK (including our MPs) need to understand that whomsoever the good citizens of the USA choose as their President is none of our business. Similarly it was none of Mr Obama's business how we voted in the referendum. His "back of the queue" remark was clearly made in an attempt to influence the way people voted and was out of order.
The UK (the Queen and the government) will afford Mr Trump all the facilities and invitations any President of the USA would get and to think otherwise is ridiculous.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.