Is Keir Starmer Really Going To Arrest...
News0 min ago
Brexit And Supreme Court.
83 Answers
Just who is paying for this expensive farce, you and me no doubt!!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by saintpeter48. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
we are paying so the SGB can hang on by their fingertips. Yes it's a farce because the whole thing is necessary. The people are the supreme authority, they elect parliament so to me it abundantly clear that the people have made the decision already. Anything else is just fudging by the anti democracy brigade. Would this case even have been brought without that stupid self gratifying Lady?
it's not the law it's an interpretation. The people elect parliament the people have given the government their instructions. A bunch of self serving popinjays will not be allowed, through their own self importance and vanity, to subvert the will of the people. The people are supreme they alone give power to parliament. Only a bunch of whining sour grape chompers cannot see that.
// I watched about 10 minutes this afternoon and lost the will to live.//
I watched about four hours - and was told that instead of the second four hours I would have to watch Shameless replays - OK I suppose
some of it is here
http://
and the transcript and papers are here
https:/
The Beeb were doing vis " Brexit wots it orl abart ven ?
and standard cockney sparras were going like " Yeah dis Brexit ven. they so called Law Lords can shove it all up their .... "
Casciani's tweets [Beeb] showed he had no idea what the case was about, who the judges were and what they were deciding
where he was - who the lawyers were and so on
Three law professors were wheeled out at 1800
The govt side was suitably thread bare - they had withdrawn their contention that no court could discuss the use of Royal Prerogative - dear lord -
The law lords ( oops members of the supreme court) were giving the govt lawyers hell and interrupting....
" you agree that a treaty has to be incorporated into domestic law by an act of parliament"
" yeah we do..."
" and you contend that withdrawal from a treaty doesnt need parliamentary intervention ?"
yes my lords we do .....
the law lords did not throw their pencils down and murmur - what rubbish .... amongst themselves
It remains to be seen if the Lords give the remoaners hell in a few days
de keyser featured largely
https:/
and also Burmah oil 1965
https:/
which we have had on AB before
http://
so you really can say you read it first on here
I watched about four hours - and was told that instead of the second four hours I would have to watch Shameless replays - OK I suppose
some of it is here
http://
and the transcript and papers are here
https:/
The Beeb were doing vis " Brexit wots it orl abart ven ?
and standard cockney sparras were going like " Yeah dis Brexit ven. they so called Law Lords can shove it all up their .... "
Casciani's tweets [Beeb] showed he had no idea what the case was about, who the judges were and what they were deciding
where he was - who the lawyers were and so on
Three law professors were wheeled out at 1800
The govt side was suitably thread bare - they had withdrawn their contention that no court could discuss the use of Royal Prerogative - dear lord -
The law lords ( oops members of the supreme court) were giving the govt lawyers hell and interrupting....
" you agree that a treaty has to be incorporated into domestic law by an act of parliament"
" yeah we do..."
" and you contend that withdrawal from a treaty doesnt need parliamentary intervention ?"
yes my lords we do .....
the law lords did not throw their pencils down and murmur - what rubbish .... amongst themselves
It remains to be seen if the Lords give the remoaners hell in a few days
de keyser featured largely
https:/
and also Burmah oil 1965
https:/
which we have had on AB before
http://
so you really can say you read it first on here
