Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Labour Couldn't Organise A 'drunken Party' In A Brewery So
Why should anyone think they have the ability or wherewithal to scrutinise any Bretix plan?
http://
Here's a plan that is simple enough for them to get their heads round.
1. Invoke A50
http://
Here's a plan that is simple enough for them to get their heads round.
1. Invoke A50
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by cassa333. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ninefingers - //Point is Labour are a waste iof space and instead of holding the Tories to account they are holding the country from progress, if people can't see that they need to open their eyes //
No - that's your opinion of the way Labour are (not) doing their job - it does not negate the need for the job to be done.
No - that's your opinion of the way Labour are (not) doing their job - it does not negate the need for the job to be done.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
I understand the role of the opposition OK. I just don't think Labour as opposition or otherwise has an ability worth diddly squat.
They ran the country to the ground and would do it again if they had their way so being able to make even halfway useful additions to any plan would kill off the UK quicker that a nuclear bomb.
Dumb and dumber come to mind.
They ran the country to the ground and would do it again if they had their way so being able to make even halfway useful additions to any plan would kill off the UK quicker that a nuclear bomb.
Dumb and dumber come to mind.
Mikey 11:14: Labour have already said that they don't intend to vote against Brexit, but its their job to hold the Tories to account and make sure that we get the best deal we can.
Telegraph tonight: However, 89 backbenchers including just one Tory and 23 Labour MPs opposed her plan in a show of defiance against the EU referendum result.
Telegraph tonight: However, 89 backbenchers including just one Tory and 23 Labour MPs opposed her plan in a show of defiance against the EU referendum result.
It's never really been answered so I'll ask again (before I retire for the night):
When did "Leaving the EU" and "Negotiating a relationship between what remains of the EU and the UK" become conjoined? Joining them up suggests that the first can only happen if the second is satisfactory. Whereas, of course, we could leave with no deal in place whatsoever. The UK could still fulfill its Lisbon obligations by negotiating for two years (though yesterday this seemed to have been chopped back, unilaterally to 18 months) but decide at the end of that period that no acceptable deal was possible. We simply then revert to being a "normal" (i.e. non-EU) country. Normal countries have not had to negotiate a relationship with the EU. Why should we?
When did "Leaving the EU" and "Negotiating a relationship between what remains of the EU and the UK" become conjoined? Joining them up suggests that the first can only happen if the second is satisfactory. Whereas, of course, we could leave with no deal in place whatsoever. The UK could still fulfill its Lisbon obligations by negotiating for two years (though yesterday this seemed to have been chopped back, unilaterally to 18 months) but decide at the end of that period that no acceptable deal was possible. We simply then revert to being a "normal" (i.e. non-EU) country. Normal countries have not had to negotiate a relationship with the EU. Why should we?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.