Jobs & Education1 min ago
Some Encouragement For Alexander?
Let's hope we may see an end to this tawdry affair.
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/201 7/01/09 /senior -milita ry-judg e-misha ndled-t rial-ja iled-ma rine-al exander /
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Gromit; I'm no lawyer, but the headline says; "Senior military judge mishandled trial of jailed marine Alexander Blackman, official report finds."
So that sounds like a serious mistake made against him, also there is the claim that it wasn't murder, but that the man was already dead which has to be proven.
So that sounds like a serious mistake made against him, also there is the claim that it wasn't murder, but that the man was already dead which has to be proven.
// guilty of an “apparent failure” to properly apply the law when he failed to give a military jury the option of convicting Alexander Blackman of the lesser charge of manslaughter //
There was no jury, there was a Court Martial Board consisting of 7 members. They found him Guilty of Murder which carries a mandatory life sentence. The job of the judge is then to determine the minimum sentence that he would apply, which was 10 years, not life.
The Judge apparently should have given the Board the option of guilty of manslaughter, for which the maximum sentence is Life. Even if that had happened, the Judge is likely not to have sentence him to life, but to something less. As the Judge had determined the punishment be 10 years, then he would probably applied the same tariff to a manslaughter charge.
So far from being a miscarriage, it is a legal technicality.
There was no jury, there was a Court Martial Board consisting of 7 members. They found him Guilty of Murder which carries a mandatory life sentence. The job of the judge is then to determine the minimum sentence that he would apply, which was 10 years, not life.
The Judge apparently should have given the Board the option of guilty of manslaughter, for which the maximum sentence is Life. Even if that had happened, the Judge is likely not to have sentence him to life, but to something less. As the Judge had determined the punishment be 10 years, then he would probably applied the same tariff to a manslaughter charge.
So far from being a miscarriage, it is a legal technicality.
My father was in the RAF, WW2, he wasn't the one who actually pressed the bomb-release but was part of the team/chain of command leading to it, which led to the 'murder' of large numbers of military and civilian personnel. That was war.
Should he, and thousands of other members of the armed forces been so charged?
Should he, and thousands of other members of the armed forces been so charged?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.