News0 min ago
I Thought It Was Only The Children Who Were At Risk, But It Now Seems That It Is Also The Women, Shall We Then Take Them In As Well?
72 Answers
Answers
I've not heard an explanation as to why the refugees cannot be settled in France. Also, if the women (as well as the children) are in danger from traffickers - the full force of the French judicial system should be brought down on the traffickers. At this point, it's not the responsibili ty of the UK.
13:39 Sun 12th Feb 2017
Mrs May should be ashamed for going back on her word over the Dubbs amendment....she supported it before she was made PM. She has been duplicitous, in the extreme.
These people are in France. If they are in danger, and I don't doubt that they are, then France should be doing its bit.
But Britain should be doing its bit as well.
These people are in France. If they are in danger, and I don't doubt that they are, then France should be doing its bit.
But Britain should be doing its bit as well.
One has to ask why are there so many lone children?
Have their parents been killed, and so they suddenly say to themselves "damn this, I might as well sail across the Mediterranean and then walk right across Europe and then perhaps caring England will look after me".
"After all I do speak the language".
Have their parents been killed, and so they suddenly say to themselves "damn this, I might as well sail across the Mediterranean and then walk right across Europe and then perhaps caring England will look after me".
"After all I do speak the language".
mikey4444
/// she supported it before she was made PM. She has been duplicitous, in the extreme. ///
And now she is PM, she is not only in the position to know of the implications, but also has the power to correct unwise earlier decisions.
/// But Britain should be doing its bit as well. ///
I think that Britain has already done more than her bit.
/// she supported it before she was made PM. She has been duplicitous, in the extreme. ///
And now she is PM, she is not only in the position to know of the implications, but also has the power to correct unwise earlier decisions.
/// But Britain should be doing its bit as well. ///
I think that Britain has already done more than her bit.
Zacs-Master
The UN Refugee Agency For Central Europe???
No axe to grind there then?
/// Some become separated from family during long and dangerous journeys; others are sent alone with traffickers and smugglers by parents desperate to deliver their children to safe havens; ///
All prime candidates for their parents to later catch up with them and then demand being reunited with their off-springs.
A much easier gateway into the UK, than having to stowaway on transport.
The UN Refugee Agency For Central Europe???
No axe to grind there then?
/// Some become separated from family during long and dangerous journeys; others are sent alone with traffickers and smugglers by parents desperate to deliver their children to safe havens; ///
All prime candidates for their parents to later catch up with them and then demand being reunited with their off-springs.
A much easier gateway into the UK, than having to stowaway on transport.
Yes I'm sure you're right. They deliberately send their children on, some as young as 5, to be abused and almost starve as they knew, presumably via their crystal balls, that Lord Dubs would, someday, announce that there would be a scheme whereby they could access Britain. The parents were also sure that they would be reunited with their children (who obviously wouldn't bear any ill feeling toward them) as were such a soft touch. Yes....that definitely seems plausible.
Zacs-Master
/// Yes I'm sure you're right. They deliberately send their children on, some as young as 5, to be abused and almost starve ///
It was not I who said that but
UNHCR
*** others are sent alone with traffickers and smugglers by parents desperate to deliver their children to safe havens; ***
But then as you have already put;
/// Oh, and why would the UNHCR lie about the circumstances of their being unaccompanied? ///
/// Yes I'm sure you're right. They deliberately send their children on, some as young as 5, to be abused and almost starve ///
It was not I who said that but
UNHCR
*** others are sent alone with traffickers and smugglers by parents desperate to deliver their children to safe havens; ***
But then as you have already put;
/// Oh, and why would the UNHCR lie about the circumstances of their being unaccompanied? ///
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.