Quizzes & Puzzles8 mins ago
Should We Get An Impartial Speaker?
59 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -politi cs-3894 7257
Clearly Bercow's recent outbursts have proved he is incompetent.
Clearly Bercow's recent outbursts have proved he is incompetent.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The speaker is a Conservative member of Parluament. So he is obviously not fully impartial, and he certainly has his own political views.
His job is to be fair, which he clearly has been.
There is no requirement by Parliament to admit the POTUS to the chamber and speak. Bercow merely has an opinion that an invitation should not go to President Trump. If the powers that be decide to offer an invitation, then Bercow will go along with it.
It is laughable how you believe that anyone who disagrees with you should be immediately sacked.
His job is to be fair, which he clearly has been.
There is no requirement by Parliament to admit the POTUS to the chamber and speak. Bercow merely has an opinion that an invitation should not go to President Trump. If the powers that be decide to offer an invitation, then Bercow will go along with it.
It is laughable how you believe that anyone who disagrees with you should be immediately sacked.
His accent like him is fake. He learned the affectation whilst sucking up to the very far Right Tories that Mikey so loves. He himself was one such before making a career move to the Left(but taking his strangulated new speech pattern with him) He is reported to have once led a "Hang Mandela" campaign, haha and the luvvies worship the little scroat.
14:09 Wed 08th Feb 2017
From a previous thread.... works here as well I suppose.
14:09 Wed 08th Feb 2017
From a previous thread.... works here as well I suppose.
The Speaker should remain impartial AT ALL TIMES. He didn't. He is in charge of making sure they all stick to the rules and yet he breaks the rules himself.
He should resign. http:// www.par liament .uk/bus iness/c ommons/ the-spe aker/th e-role- of-the- speaker /role-o f-the-s peaker/
He should resign. http://
The Honour of addressing both Houses of Parliament is strictly by invitation, and there is no statute making it obligatory.
Reagan was first to get the invite. Clinton and Obama have also done it. Carter, Ford,Bush Snr, Bush Jnr, were never invited. So not inviting Trump is not unprecedented and not an insult.
Reagan was first to get the invite. Clinton and Obama have also done it. Carter, Ford,Bush Snr, Bush Jnr, were never invited. So not inviting Trump is not unprecedented and not an insult.
The speaker's chair is not a seat for anyone to voice their private views to the world. It is, and always has been an impartial adjudicators position of trust. This little sociopath has besmirched the chair and tarnished every previous honourable speaker in the process, whilst diminishing respect for the office for all future holders. The only positive that I can glean from the debacle is that, the people who appear to be giving him their wholehearted support have been wrong on every issue in the last 12 months, so he is dead man walking.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.