ChatterBank3 mins ago
Katie Hopkins Loses In Court Again !
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
it seems Jack ( she IS a girl right ? ) Monroe had pleaded details of damage rather than it could have been damage
£24k seems rather low in comparison to the good old days
"Can of worms opened. Judge must be a half-wit."
oh dear the habit of cursing judges who make decisions that displease someone cannot die soon enough
If you think about it - half the clients in a civil case will think the judge is a 'bad judge' - the losing half most of the time
£24k seems rather low in comparison to the good old days
"Can of worms opened. Judge must be a half-wit."
oh dear the habit of cursing judges who make decisions that displease someone cannot die soon enough
If you think about it - half the clients in a civil case will think the judge is a 'bad judge' - the losing half most of the time
£107k costs on account. Full costs to be decided later.
https:/
https:/
.// seems odd that asking a question is enough to prove defamation.//3T
Not really
"Sometimes a statement may not be defamatory on the face of it but contain an innuendo, which has a defamatory meaning. Such a statement may be actionable. The hidden meaning must be one that could be understood from the words themselves by people who knew the claimant (Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234) and must be specifically pleaded by the claimant."
libel is a complex area where the London lawyers make lots and lots of lovely munnay !
Not really
"Sometimes a statement may not be defamatory on the face of it but contain an innuendo, which has a defamatory meaning. Such a statement may be actionable. The hidden meaning must be one that could be understood from the words themselves by people who knew the claimant (Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234) and must be specifically pleaded by the claimant."
libel is a complex area where the London lawyers make lots and lots of lovely munnay !
YMB - //To be fair Sam she shold have apologised over the mistake.
As AH has said we all do it but most on here are gracious enough to admit they got it wrong and apologise (and mean it). //
Absolutely.
Anyone can get carried away sitting at a keyboard (tell me about it!)
But being advised that you have overstepped the mark and offered a chance to out it right, and being too arrogant and pig-headed to comply, means you deserve what you get.
I would guess that because this was on TwitFace, that Ms. Hopkins has been sued as a private individual, and will not have the bottomless pockets of her tabloid employers to pay out for her.
As AH has said we all do it but most on here are gracious enough to admit they got it wrong and apologise (and mean it). //
Absolutely.
Anyone can get carried away sitting at a keyboard (tell me about it!)
But being advised that you have overstepped the mark and offered a chance to out it right, and being too arrogant and pig-headed to comply, means you deserve what you get.
I would guess that because this was on TwitFace, that Ms. Hopkins has been sued as a private individual, and will not have the bottomless pockets of her tabloid employers to pay out for her.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.