News5 mins ago
Do You Think This Is Offensive?
When I first saw the story, I thought so - but I now get what the artist was trying to do.
But it still seems pretty stupid. If you stopped and thought for a second, "How will this come across?" surely you wouldn't put the sign up?
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ society /2017/m ar/15/b eware-j ews-roa d-sign- north-l ondon-r eported -police
But it still seems pretty stupid. If you stopped and thought for a second, "How will this come across?" surely you wouldn't put the sign up?
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Why haven't Christians been offended by this one?
http:// www.car modelsl ist.com /blog/w p-conte nt/uplo ads/201 7/01/Cr ossroad -Sign.j pg
http://
Gromit
I think the difference with this sign is that it falls outside what we regard as warnings.
If you think of warning signs for horses, cattle or elderly people crossing, you will generally see them in profile - ie. crossing the given carriageway.
This sign doesn't look like that - it looks like (at first glance) 'watch out for Jews'.
If it has been in profile, it would have made more sense.
I think the difference with this sign is that it falls outside what we regard as warnings.
If you think of warning signs for horses, cattle or elderly people crossing, you will generally see them in profile - ie. crossing the given carriageway.
This sign doesn't look like that - it looks like (at first glance) 'watch out for Jews'.
If it has been in profile, it would have made more sense.
Like many artists they don't stop and reflect on what effect their image may have (perhaps they shouldn't have to)
Being an "older" person I object to this sign~
http:// www.set on.co.u k/media /catalo g/produ ct/cach e/3/ima ge/85e4 522595e fc69f49 6374d01 ef2bf13 /144950 0077/d/ a/dal.i mage.15 8207_st d.lang. all.jpg
My OH does not have a stick, and neither of us are bent.
But this one is OK!
http:// i.daily mail.co .uk/i/p ix/2015 /05/17/ 23/28CA CACD000 00578-3 085621- image-m -34_143 1900838 490.jpg
Being an "older" person I object to this sign~
http://
My OH does not have a stick, and neither of us are bent.
But this one is OK!
http://
http:// tinypic .com/vi ew.php? pic=23k 7wp0&am p;s=9#. WMmT62e kIcA I saw this a while ago - made me laugh
why is it a "beware of" anything sign, Talbot?
What you normally see in such signs are pictures of pedestrians
http:// www.roa d-signs .uk.com /Road_S igns/Pe destria n_Cross ing/pro ductima ges/Ped estrian _Crossi ng_Road _Sign.g if
or workmen opening sun umbrellas
http:// l7.alam y.com/z ooms/b6 3e7ae86 8d849c6 879e797 2529bad da/road works-s ign-aye 9br.jpg
There is no danger from such people. The driver is a danger to them.
What you normally see in such signs are pictures of pedestrians
http://
or workmen opening sun umbrellas
http://
There is no danger from such people. The driver is a danger to them.
Ok delete 'of' (was in hurry to get in shower)
beware-Muslims
but same question applies.
I have to admit I was looking forward to Gromit's posts, he hasn't let me down ... exactly what I expected.
I also think if the sign was Muslim-Beware you yourself may have had a different view of it, jno ... as would others.
beware-Muslims
but same question applies.
I have to admit I was looking forward to Gromit's posts, he hasn't let me down ... exactly what I expected.
I also think if the sign was Muslim-Beware you yourself may have had a different view of it, jno ... as would others.