Internet2 mins ago
Has Sweden Learnt The Lesson, That Others Should Now Follow?
58 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-43 96224/S weden-n ever-ma ss-immi gration -PM-say s.html
/// Stefan Löfven pledged to change his country's liberal attitude, insisting the massive influx allowed during the 2015 migrant crisis would never happen again. ///
/// Stefan Löfven pledged to change his country's liberal attitude, insisting the massive influx allowed during the 2015 migrant crisis would never happen again. ///
Answers
The liberalism relates to the 'multicutura lism' which we can see leads to violent (rape etc) crime.
11:55 Mon 10th Apr 2017
-- answer removed --
youngmafbog
I don't think there's a correlation between liberalism and crime.
Sweden is down at a lowly 175th (right next to the UK) in the world ranking for homicides according to Wikipedia.
This is well below those countries renowned for their conservatism, such as Austria, China, India, Sri Lanka, Kuwait, Nepal, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru and the United States of America.
I don't think there's a correlation between liberalism and crime.
Sweden is down at a lowly 175th (right next to the UK) in the world ranking for homicides according to Wikipedia.
This is well below those countries renowned for their conservatism, such as Austria, China, India, Sri Lanka, Kuwait, Nepal, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru and the United States of America.
sp //There's legal economic migration, and there's asylum//
It matters little whether they come legally or illegally, they have all in their midst those who have contributed to make Sweden the rape-capital of Europe.
Apart from Pat Condell's videao, I have first-hand evidence of this from a close friends daughter.
It matters little whether they come legally or illegally, they have all in their midst those who have contributed to make Sweden the rape-capital of Europe.
Apart from Pat Condell's videao, I have first-hand evidence of this from a close friends daughter.
"NJ, But if she told me isn't that first hand?"
No, because you did not witness what happened. You cannot give evidence in court about events that somebody else has told you of but which you didn't witness. It's called "hearsay" evidence and is not, bar in a few exceptional circumstances, admissable. If Jane tells you that New Judge punched her in the face you cannot go to court and say "New Judge punched Jane in the face" because you didn't see it happen.
No, because you did not witness what happened. You cannot give evidence in court about events that somebody else has told you of but which you didn't witness. It's called "hearsay" evidence and is not, bar in a few exceptional circumstances, admissable. If Jane tells you that New Judge punched her in the face you cannot go to court and say "New Judge punched Jane in the face" because you didn't see it happen.
It isn't evidence of Sweden becoming a frightening place. It's only evidence of somebody telling you (whether they do so by e-Mail, letter of face to face) that they believe Sweden is becoming a frightening place. To be able to give evidence that Sweden is becoming a frightening place you would have to live there and experience the fright for yourself. Even then you could only say that you were frightened and not necessarily that everybody else was.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.