ChatterBank2 mins ago
General Election 2017: Labour 'plans Water Industry Nationalisation'
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/el ection- 2017-39 930278
Whats not to like ?
The water industry are continuing to fail to dealing with leaks. Instead of dealing with these leaks, they prefer to pay huge dividends to shareholders ::
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ comment isfree/ 2012/ma y/08/wa ter-ind ustry-p ipes-sc andal
Whats not to like ?
The water industry are continuing to fail to dealing with leaks. Instead of dealing with these leaks, they prefer to pay huge dividends to shareholders ::
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I wonder where he intends to find the money to nationalise anything? According to City analysts a couple of years ago, the bill for nationalising the energy sector would be in the region of £185 billion.
https:/ /www.th eguardi an.com/ busines s/2015/ aug/07/ jeremy- corbyns -bill-n ational ising-e nergy-s ector-1 85bn
He’s going to do an awful lot with the money he fleeces from big business and those who earn over £80,000.
https:/
He’s going to do an awful lot with the money he fleeces from big business and those who earn over £80,000.
Garaman...read the Guardian link....leaks are exactly the same now as they were when the industry was stolen from tax and rate payers. Instead of money being used for the good of the water industry and the population, it is going straight into the pockets of greedy shareholders.
We have no more choice over who we buy our water from, than we did before privatisation.
We have no more choice over who we buy our water from, than we did before privatisation.
Welllll leeeets seeeeee.
Governments have about as much chance of effectively running a business than my cat has of convincing the local mouse population that she has only their best interests at heart when she catches them.
And I believe that is true of any government not just the bankrupt the country mentality of the Labour Party.
Perhaps if I was being really generous to a government (startup costs not withstanding) I would make them Not For Profit organisations. But as Naomi points out the country hasn't the means to take anything back.
Governments have about as much chance of effectively running a business than my cat has of convincing the local mouse population that she has only their best interests at heart when she catches them.
And I believe that is true of any government not just the bankrupt the country mentality of the Labour Party.
Perhaps if I was being really generous to a government (startup costs not withstanding) I would make them Not For Profit organisations. But as Naomi points out the country hasn't the means to take anything back.
Mikey, the leakage rates would have gone up in the early 90s whoever was in charge because the infrastructure was in such a bad state. I agree that Ofwat hasn't been doing its job properly, but that just shows again how you can't rely on public organisations. The only thing we can say for sure is that the leak situation would have been much worse had it still been in public hands.
One could just grab them back and say, thanks. The water companies are not the whole energy sector, it's not even energy. Makes one wonder how the government squandered the £185B when they sold. I think we need official relevant figures to comment on buy back. But the treasury has about £40B net reserves at present, so if an investment for the future in the water industry was prioritised, they'd find the budget.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.