Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Students And Ukip. Unknown Factors.
Tories bound to benefit from former UKIP votes but already this morning it appears students might be turning out in force to vote Labour to get debt-free education. Interesting juxtaposition.
Answers
Difficult to predict. If students are out in the MORNING then we can expect a much higher turnout for the youth vote! You're right that the Tories will benefit from UKIP's redundancy. But I think that you will find a fair few trying Labour out. After all, they're the ones promising to nationalise things, and it is those policies that Ukippers cite the most often...
10:29 Thu 08th Jun 2017
Well of course if you are in opposition you can promise all sorts of things to people without caring how you are going to pay for it.
This has been Corbyn's main approach.
No tuition fees, more for the NHS, more police, more houses, etc etc
He does seem to care that the country is one and a half trillion ponds in debt (and will probably be even more in debt if he gets in power for 5 years).
Hopefully there are enough people to see through his "give away" promises to keep him out of power.
This has been Corbyn's main approach.
No tuition fees, more for the NHS, more police, more houses, etc etc
He does seem to care that the country is one and a half trillion ponds in debt (and will probably be even more in debt if he gets in power for 5 years).
Hopefully there are enough people to see through his "give away" promises to keep him out of power.
Difficult to predict.
If students are out in the MORNING then we can expect a much higher turnout for the youth vote!
You're right that the Tories will benefit from UKIP's redundancy.
But I think that you will find a fair few trying Labour out. After all, they're the ones promising to nationalise things, and it is those policies that Ukippers cite the most often when you get past the "grey suits of Brussels" arguments (re-nationalisation of railways for example, protection of industries etc).
And that sounds like a Corbyn vote?
As you say, many unknown factors.
If students are out in the MORNING then we can expect a much higher turnout for the youth vote!
You're right that the Tories will benefit from UKIP's redundancy.
But I think that you will find a fair few trying Labour out. After all, they're the ones promising to nationalise things, and it is those policies that Ukippers cite the most often when you get past the "grey suits of Brussels" arguments (re-nationalisation of railways for example, protection of industries etc).
And that sounds like a Corbyn vote?
As you say, many unknown factors.
Well done Cameron/Clegg.
The Student Loan Scheme has been a huge success...
// Student loan debt rose £12.6bn, or 17 per cent, to £86.2bn in the past year //
// About 70 per cent of students who left university last year are expected never to finish repaying their loans, according to modelling carried out by the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Instead they will have to make repayments for 30 years before then having the unpaid loan written off. //
https:/ /www.ft .com/co ntent/5 5f4a6f6 -3eab-1 1e6-9f2 c-36b48 7ebd80a
The Student Loan Scheme has been a huge success...
// Student loan debt rose £12.6bn, or 17 per cent, to £86.2bn in the past year //
// About 70 per cent of students who left university last year are expected never to finish repaying their loans, according to modelling carried out by the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Instead they will have to make repayments for 30 years before then having the unpaid loan written off. //
https:/
"Do some students ever think past the end of their nose?"
Well, for what little it's worth, I never supported a party because of tuition fee promises. I'm saddled with a mountain of debt but I'd like to think that I have something to show for it at the end, and so far haven't had to pay a penny of it back anyway.
One thing worth pointing out is that tuition fees have gone hand-in-hand with increased student attendance at universities. If you think that's a good thing then it seems that tuition fees have worked; if you'd rather fewer people went to university then perhaps it's actually better that we lose tuition fees and fund university some other way -- as long as it's not a privilege of the wealthy, of course.
Well, for what little it's worth, I never supported a party because of tuition fee promises. I'm saddled with a mountain of debt but I'd like to think that I have something to show for it at the end, and so far haven't had to pay a penny of it back anyway.
One thing worth pointing out is that tuition fees have gone hand-in-hand with increased student attendance at universities. If you think that's a good thing then it seems that tuition fees have worked; if you'd rather fewer people went to university then perhaps it's actually better that we lose tuition fees and fund university some other way -- as long as it's not a privilege of the wealthy, of course.
Gromit, //Well done Cameron/Clegg. //
//Jeremy Corbyn has apologised on behalf of the Labour party for its introduction of tuition fees in 1998.//
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/polit ics/jer emy-cor byn-apo logises -to-you ng-peop le-for- labours -introd uction- of-tuit ion-fee s-10391 434.htm l
//Jeremy Corbyn has apologised on behalf of the Labour party for its introduction of tuition fees in 1998.//
http://
I have what I think is a good idea for funding. Why not give grants to the most intellectual percentage, and tell the rest that they aren't in the top group, should not look upon university as a right to enjoy a few years, and should not be removed from the unemployed count after all ? That way everyone gains. The country educates to greater than the standard secondary level only those who can use the education, the others get to look for paid employment years earlier they they otherwise would thus giving them a few extra years to found a decent career path and save for the things needed in life, and there should be spaces freed up to charge foreign students thus beginning in income and giving them the skills their country needs. Win/win/win/win
The issue there is that when a qualification is commonplace it becomes a necessity not an extra. If one didn't try to bring everyone up to whatever degree level is nowadays then employers would not ask for it. And in addition is job descriptions didn't change but stuck to the basic skills that were always needed then tending to folk would not need degrees.
Scooping...I wouldn't be so sure about all the UKIP votes returning to the Tories. In my own constituency of Gower, an awful lot came from Labour in 2015.
I wouldn't have thought that it was possible, that people who had voted for Labour all their lives, would then transfer their vote to a right-wing Party like UKIP.
We live in strange times !
I wouldn't have thought that it was possible, that people who had voted for Labour all their lives, would then transfer their vote to a right-wing Party like UKIP.
We live in strange times !
Plenty of ex-Labour voters went to UKIP as people felt the party had abandoned its base in favour of metropolitan liberals.
Not completely fair imho, but it's also got more than a grain of truth.
Most of those people, it seems to me, will have swung to the Conservatives but it won't be them that swings the election - UKIP support was always substantial as a sheer number but was thinly spread across the country, which is a death sentence in the UK's dumb voting system.
Historically speaking, the two most powerful influences on UK elections are the Murdoch-owned press which are rabidly pro-Tory and the grey vote which will probably stick with the Tories albeit with less enthusiasm than before. If Labour does manage to really significantly increase turnout, it would mean a fundamental change in the voting pattern which has dominated my lifetime. Not impossible by any means, but unlikely.
Not completely fair imho, but it's also got more than a grain of truth.
Most of those people, it seems to me, will have swung to the Conservatives but it won't be them that swings the election - UKIP support was always substantial as a sheer number but was thinly spread across the country, which is a death sentence in the UK's dumb voting system.
Historically speaking, the two most powerful influences on UK elections are the Murdoch-owned press which are rabidly pro-Tory and the grey vote which will probably stick with the Tories albeit with less enthusiasm than before. If Labour does manage to really significantly increase turnout, it would mean a fundamental change in the voting pattern which has dominated my lifetime. Not impossible by any means, but unlikely.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.