Shopping & Style6 mins ago
Ab Poll V The Real Thing?
I can't seem to find the AB election poll , I know it had to be removed , but I assumed it would be back.
I am interested in seeing how the %'s in the AB poll compared to the actual result?
What would the result be if the AB % vote was 'real'?
I am interested in seeing how the %'s in the AB poll compared to the actual result?
What would the result be if the AB % vote was 'real'?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by EDDIE51. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Found it
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/News /Questi on15558 97.html
can someone translate these %s into seats for each party please?
http://
can someone translate these %s into seats for each party please?
At the start of the election we also had a poll, and I tried to do the same analysis then in anticipation.
The rough answer is that the Tories were on course, according to AB, for maybe as many as 450 seats in total, and Labour were heading for oblivion.
So I think that's the end of AB polls as any kind of predictor. It's actually a bit of a surprise -- I did some digging and AB had usually been not totally dreadful, or at least consistent in its error. Clearly the demographics have shifted markedly, so that very few non-Tory/UKIP voters really hang around here.
In a nutshell, AB got it very, very, very wrong.
The rough answer is that the Tories were on course, according to AB, for maybe as many as 450 seats in total, and Labour were heading for oblivion.
So I think that's the end of AB polls as any kind of predictor. It's actually a bit of a surprise -- I did some digging and AB had usually been not totally dreadful, or at least consistent in its error. Clearly the demographics have shifted markedly, so that very few non-Tory/UKIP voters really hang around here.
In a nutshell, AB got it very, very, very wrong.
Before this election AB was still wrong, but very systematically so. Seemed that you could make a fairly accurate prediction of the actual result by correcting for the systematic error in consistent ways, eg in 2015 and 2010 I think AB got the Tory vote wrong by the same amount, Lib dems about right both times, and Labour wrong by the same amount both times.
Similarly "wrong", but predictably so, about the EU referendum. So yeah it's always been wrong but wrong in a consistent way. Until last night, when AB's Tory voters decided to stick with May even despite all her blunders (this last not a supposition, but straight from the horse's mouths, as it were), unlike what was seen in the rest of the country.
So yes. AB's poll was wrong. Predicting that the Tories would come in front of a Labour party that, until two weeks ago, was in an absolute shambles, takes no skill at all. I could have polled myself and told you that. What matters isn't the lead the Tories had, but the scale of it. A prediction isn't "Tory lead" but "Tory lead by so many seats". And AB was out by easily a hundred, probably more.
Similarly "wrong", but predictably so, about the EU referendum. So yeah it's always been wrong but wrong in a consistent way. Until last night, when AB's Tory voters decided to stick with May even despite all her blunders (this last not a supposition, but straight from the horse's mouths, as it were), unlike what was seen in the rest of the country.
So yes. AB's poll was wrong. Predicting that the Tories would come in front of a Labour party that, until two weeks ago, was in an absolute shambles, takes no skill at all. I could have polled myself and told you that. What matters isn't the lead the Tories had, but the scale of it. A prediction isn't "Tory lead" but "Tory lead by so many seats". And AB was out by easily a hundred, probably more.