Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......

Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 08:20 Thu 29th Jun 2017 | News
53 Answers
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-40420511
Yep it's another belter from the religion of peace.
prev Natural Selection At Work?
  
next Could This Now Be An End To Those Costa Del Sol Holidays We Once Enjoyed?
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 53 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Avatar Image
sandyRoe
Best Answer
No child should be subjected to mutilation for religious reasons. When they reached the age of 18 they could decide if they wanted this procedure done. I doubt if many would.
09:19 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Go To Best Answer
Avatar Image ummmm
It appears in this case they did!

It's well known that Jews circumcise their boys and usually have a ceremony surrounding it.
10:56 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image Gromit
// Dr Balvinder Mehat of the Bakersfield Medical Centre in Nottingham carried out the procedure on the baby boy while he was in the care of his father, who is separated from the mother. //

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/mother-takes-gp-court-private-prosecution-nottinghamshire-circumcision-baby-boy-without-permission-a7736761.html

It seems clear that the Grand parents had the consent of the father, so they did not go behind his back. The mother had not given permission, so to carry out the mutilation was wrong, but more a technicality.

Thousands of male babies are mutilated every week because both parents consent, but apparently that is OK with you.
10:58 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image ummmm
OK with who, Gromit?
11:03 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image -Talbot-
Child mutilation and a bit of mysogyny thrown in for free then, Gromit
11:08 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image anneasquith
A decent piece of journalism, thanks gromit .
11:10 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image -Talbot-
Which bit was the decent journalism, Anne?

The woman being a technicality?
11:20 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image Gromit
// Which bit was the decent journalism, Anne? //

I assume the Independent report that I linked to.

// OK with who, Gromit? //

The consensus seems to be that if the mutalation is done by a Rabbi with the consent of both parents, then there is nothing wrong. But if a muslim doctor does it with only one of the parents' consent, then it is barbarism.
It is barbaric irrespective of which religion does the attack on a defenceless baby.
13:20 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image ummmm
I agree with that. It should only be done for medical reasons.
13:25 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image Bazile
from the link

//Three-quarters of American adult men are circumcised -//
crikey - i didn't know that
13:32 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image Baldric

Between the two given Links it says he was
'in the care of his Father'
and
'and apparently staying with his paternal grandparents, who are Muslim'
Nowhere does it state his Father approved.
13:43 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image anneasquith
Indeed baldric, the reporting in the independent was far superior..
17:09 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image anneasquith
Oh heck. Indeed gromit ....
17:36 Thu 29th Jun 2017
Avatar Image pixie374
Or that the father had any legal rights over the child. It should only be done for medical reasons.
17:38 Thu 29th Jun 2017

41 to 53 of 53rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Grand Parents Arrange Gbh On Their Grandson......

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.