Starmer & Lammy A Marriage Made In...
News4 mins ago
Will Jeremy Corbyn Be Dangerous Should He Becomes Pm?
59 Answers
The following three considerations (amongst many) could well occur should Jeremy Corbyn becomes PM:
(1) Open door policies for immigrants and refugees from all corners of the earth - causing disharmony & strive. As long as there are perceived opposing differences in ‘culture’ & ‘religion’ amongst residents of a country there will be separate lifestyles & hence potential disharmony & friction.
(2) Corbynmania is dangerous as lack of creditable defence cause wars, as tin-pot dictators only understand military force, not negotiations. Should Corbyn manage to introduce his CND policies, which he espouse, UK will FOEVER be threatened and bullied militarily (lost of sovereignty) by present & future nuclear powers. Nuclear deterrent has kept the peace between the superpowers since WW2 (over 70 years ago). UK use her nuclear deterrence everyday to deter (and insure) against the most extreme treats from existing nuclear powers (and against those countries are desperate seeking to become nuclear powers). Also, hot pursuit of terrorists can be regarded as self-defence or confrontation of aggression/crime against humanity - like police force do. The modus operandi of megalomaniac power crazy dictators is not negotiations (as Jeremy Corbyn mistakenly keep repeating parrot fashion), but military strength.
(3) Jeremy Corbyn is keen to give-in to demands for Scottish independent referendum. Only Westminster Parliament (not devolved Parliaments) has the legislative competence whether to allow (with the approval of the monarch) an independent referendum to any home nation (like Scotland). It is also for Westminster Parliament to decide on the wording of the referendum question, date & suffrage franchise of voters in the independence referendum. Also, Scottish residents that was able to vote in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum included current Scottish residents who were: British citizens, commonwealth students & workers, Irish citizen, EU citizens living Scotland at the time.The franchise of voters for any future independence referendum (should they ever occur again) should be only be for British citizens born in Scotland (including Scottish expats), regardless of whether or not they are currently living in Scotland at the time.
(1) Open door policies for immigrants and refugees from all corners of the earth - causing disharmony & strive. As long as there are perceived opposing differences in ‘culture’ & ‘religion’ amongst residents of a country there will be separate lifestyles & hence potential disharmony & friction.
(2) Corbynmania is dangerous as lack of creditable defence cause wars, as tin-pot dictators only understand military force, not negotiations. Should Corbyn manage to introduce his CND policies, which he espouse, UK will FOEVER be threatened and bullied militarily (lost of sovereignty) by present & future nuclear powers. Nuclear deterrent has kept the peace between the superpowers since WW2 (over 70 years ago). UK use her nuclear deterrence everyday to deter (and insure) against the most extreme treats from existing nuclear powers (and against those countries are desperate seeking to become nuclear powers). Also, hot pursuit of terrorists can be regarded as self-defence or confrontation of aggression/crime against humanity - like police force do. The modus operandi of megalomaniac power crazy dictators is not negotiations (as Jeremy Corbyn mistakenly keep repeating parrot fashion), but military strength.
(3) Jeremy Corbyn is keen to give-in to demands for Scottish independent referendum. Only Westminster Parliament (not devolved Parliaments) has the legislative competence whether to allow (with the approval of the monarch) an independent referendum to any home nation (like Scotland). It is also for Westminster Parliament to decide on the wording of the referendum question, date & suffrage franchise of voters in the independence referendum. Also, Scottish residents that was able to vote in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum included current Scottish residents who were: British citizens, commonwealth students & workers, Irish citizen, EU citizens living Scotland at the time.The franchise of voters for any future independence referendum (should they ever occur again) should be only be for British citizens born in Scotland (including Scottish expats), regardless of whether or not they are currently living in Scotland at the time.
Answers
Of course he won't. Be positively Utopian. All local Gov, N.H, Civil Service,
13:18 Sun 23rd Jul 2017
willbewhatiwill ....your name is awfully familiar but for the life of me, I can't seem to remember why ?
Your first point is entirely wrong...."Open door policies"...you are confusing this with the policy since 2010. Its the Tories that have allowed immigration to increase at its present rate
Your second question is also awry. Our nuclear weapons are meant to be used on the Russians, and they have shown no indication whatsoever of invading Britain....ever.
Your third point is even more strange. In the Scottish referendum in 2014, both Labour and the Tories campaigned to have Scotland stay in the UK, and if you remember, it was Gordon Brown that stepped into the debate towards the end, and played his part in getting the 55.4% vote against independence.
Your first point is entirely wrong...."Open door policies"...you are confusing this with the policy since 2010. Its the Tories that have allowed immigration to increase at its present rate
Your second question is also awry. Our nuclear weapons are meant to be used on the Russians, and they have shown no indication whatsoever of invading Britain....ever.
Your third point is even more strange. In the Scottish referendum in 2014, both Labour and the Tories campaigned to have Scotland stay in the UK, and if you remember, it was Gordon Brown that stepped into the debate towards the end, and played his part in getting the 55.4% vote against independence.
(1) mikey4444, you said, "your name is awfully familiar but for the life of me"
Answer: Perhaps, you saw my post on Sky News blogs, when they were open to posters,
(2) mikey4444, you said, "our nuclear weapons are meant to be used on the Russians"
Answer: Nuclear deterrents deter aggression from all nuclear powers, as well as those fast seeking to acquire them (like North Korea, Iran, etc)- certainly not only Russia.
(3)mikey4444, you said, "both Labour and the Tories campaigned to have Scotland stay in the UK",
Answer: Jeremy Corbyn said a few months ago that as PM he would allow another Scottish referendum, should the Scottish First Minister asked for another one.
Answer: Perhaps, you saw my post on Sky News blogs, when they were open to posters,
(2) mikey4444, you said, "our nuclear weapons are meant to be used on the Russians"
Answer: Nuclear deterrents deter aggression from all nuclear powers, as well as those fast seeking to acquire them (like North Korea, Iran, etc)- certainly not only Russia.
(3)mikey4444, you said, "both Labour and the Tories campaigned to have Scotland stay in the UK",
Answer: Jeremy Corbyn said a few months ago that as PM he would allow another Scottish referendum, should the Scottish First Minister asked for another one.
mikey4444, you said, "both Labour and the Tories campaigned to have Scotland stay in the UK".
As I said in my earlier post Jeremy Corbyn is keen to give-in to demands for Scottish independent referendum.
http://
As I said in my earlier post Jeremy Corbyn is keen to give-in to demands for Scottish independent referendum.
http://
mikey4444 stated, "why would North Korea and/or Iran attack Britain at all"
Nuclear deterrents deter aggression from nuclear powers or those fast seeking to acquire them (like North Korea, Iran, etc). North Korea, Iran and other future nuclear powers will bully and threaten UK militarily should UK give-in (sort of surrender or 'shooting oneself in the foot') to unilateral disbarment. This will certainly be very dangerous.
Nuclear deterrents deter aggression from nuclear powers or those fast seeking to acquire them (like North Korea, Iran, etc). North Korea, Iran and other future nuclear powers will bully and threaten UK militarily should UK give-in (sort of surrender or 'shooting oneself in the foot') to unilateral disbarment. This will certainly be very dangerous.
mikey4444
/// Your first point is entirely wrong...."Open door policies"...you are confusing this with the policy since 2010. Its the Tories that have allowed immigration to increase at its present rate ///
Because of our membership of the EU, that is why we voted 'OUT'
Labour first introduced mass immigration into this country, Labour also let in Romania and Bulgaria when other EU countries put a block on them.
In 2004, the UK was one of only three EU member states that did not introduce transitional labour market controls on migrants from new accession states and saw a sharp increase in migration from these countries.
A report on Labour's embarrassing immigration secrets.
Read and learn mikey.
http://
If Labour ever got back in, we would be swamped and bankrupt, within a very short time.
/// Your first point is entirely wrong...."Open door policies"...you are confusing this with the policy since 2010. Its the Tories that have allowed immigration to increase at its present rate ///
Because of our membership of the EU, that is why we voted 'OUT'
Labour first introduced mass immigration into this country, Labour also let in Romania and Bulgaria when other EU countries put a block on them.
In 2004, the UK was one of only three EU member states that did not introduce transitional labour market controls on migrants from new accession states and saw a sharp increase in migration from these countries.
A report on Labour's embarrassing immigration secrets.
Read and learn mikey.
http://
If Labour ever got back in, we would be swamped and bankrupt, within a very short time.
mikey4444 stated, "your explanation of why NK or Iran would attack Britain with nuclear weapons is...fantasy!"
Really? Being pacifist will encourage (rather than deter) others to launch military attack on oneself or other 3rd countries. Being well-armed militarily is a good deterrence from being attacked by another country – analogous to a well-armed effective police force can deter criminals.
Military strength can be used to prevent wars not start wars, analogous to having a deterrent from being bullied in a school playground.
If Europe & USA do not have credible military force, for example, it will be more likely that they will experience more threats (& even invaded) by other countries, causing chaos & disruption.
World politics, life & everything requires - making alliances, influences, trade, co-operation, look after each other interests, taking sides, preserving world order even in a playground level, never mind world government's scale.
Really? Being pacifist will encourage (rather than deter) others to launch military attack on oneself or other 3rd countries. Being well-armed militarily is a good deterrence from being attacked by another country – analogous to a well-armed effective police force can deter criminals.
Military strength can be used to prevent wars not start wars, analogous to having a deterrent from being bullied in a school playground.
If Europe & USA do not have credible military force, for example, it will be more likely that they will experience more threats (& even invaded) by other countries, causing chaos & disruption.
World politics, life & everything requires - making alliances, influences, trade, co-operation, look after each other interests, taking sides, preserving world order even in a playground level, never mind world government's scale.
mikey4444 stated, "the vast number of countries in the world do not have nuclear weapons, and yet they don't seem to have any difficulty in warding off attacks by NK and/or Iran!"
UK is a significant world power, unlike most countries!
UK is the 5th richest country in the world and 6th world military power. (See http://
UK also have 14 British Overseas Territories and lots of Commonwealth Countries (who were former colonies of UK).
UK is also one of the 5 UN Permanent Security Council Members (i.e. UK, USA, France, Russia, China) - de facto the police force of the world.
UK is a significant world power, unlike most countries!
UK is the 5th richest country in the world and 6th world military power. (See http://
UK also have 14 British Overseas Territories and lots of Commonwealth Countries (who were former colonies of UK).
UK is also one of the 5 UN Permanent Security Council Members (i.e. UK, USA, France, Russia, China) - de facto the police force of the world.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.