Quizzes & Puzzles12 mins ago
Two More Nightclub Killings
http://
"Police have ruled out a terrorist motive. A spokesperson told N-TV that the gunman was a 34-year-old Iraqi citizen, but not an asylum seeker."
So that's OK then?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The German Police have clearly been instructed by Obergruppenführer Merkle to deny ANY incident is related to immigration. We have seen this happen countless times only to be later shown it was down to immigration so it is hardly surprising people are sceptical.
If the German rozzers want to do this it would be far better to wait until they had decided what he was (eg mentally ill or a lone wolf whatever that is) rather than discount one rather obvious avenue.
If the German rozzers want to do this it would be far better to wait until they had decided what he was (eg mentally ill or a lone wolf whatever that is) rather than discount one rather obvious avenue.
>What volume of deaths through Islamic fundamentalists will get you worrying, FF?
What a strange question?
One. In fact we've had lots already. Any deaths through murder are worrying.
Yes, odd question. A non-sequiteur again!
Pointless trying to speculate abouta cover up. Will you change your way of life depending on whether this was terrorist related or not. What eveidence is there the police are lying? Why would they? Maybe they are being 'economical with the truth' of course while hey carry out investigations- maybe not to alert possible accomplices.
What a strange question?
One. In fact we've had lots already. Any deaths through murder are worrying.
Yes, odd question. A non-sequiteur again!
Pointless trying to speculate abouta cover up. Will you change your way of life depending on whether this was terrorist related or not. What eveidence is there the police are lying? Why would they? Maybe they are being 'economical with the truth' of course while hey carry out investigations- maybe not to alert possible accomplices.
Let's get real here ... I asked if the police didn't have a motive how can they rule out terrorism after such a short time, impossible imo.
So a perfectly sane and reasonable question.
mikey then wants to label me a usual suspect, someone who gets excited when Muslims kill ... bizarre!
Even though it was mikey who mentioned 'Islamic terrorism' and mikey who mention 'Muslim'
What I find odd is that it is almost a certainty that if the police had said this was terrorist related you would be hiding behind the fence, mikey.
So a perfectly sane and reasonable question.
mikey then wants to label me a usual suspect, someone who gets excited when Muslims kill ... bizarre!
Even though it was mikey who mentioned 'Islamic terrorism' and mikey who mention 'Muslim'
What I find odd is that it is almost a certainty that if the police had said this was terrorist related you would be hiding behind the fence, mikey.
I doubt mikey would hide behind the fence. Why would anyone. We know there is a problem with Islamism already. I think some enjoy the "nudge, nudge wink wink" aspects and hope to be able to say "ha told you so", . If that's what floats their boat that's fine. I'm happy to believe the authorities on these matters until such time as it's clear there is a conspiracy of silence/denial
Ah !........then you don't have any evidence Talbot....thought not.
I consider this a perfectly reasonable question ... just how stupid are you mikey?
I haven't said there was evidence that this was an Islamic terrorist attack. I have stated that if the police did not have enough evidence to say what caused this attack then they didn't have enough evidence to discount terrorism.
We don't yet know why this man was shooting people with a gun but it wasn't terrorism.
Something not right about issuing that sort of statement only hours after the incident.
I consider this a perfectly reasonable question ... just how stupid are you mikey?
I haven't said there was evidence that this was an Islamic terrorist attack. I have stated that if the police did not have enough evidence to say what caused this attack then they didn't have enough evidence to discount terrorism.
We don't yet know why this man was shooting people with a gun but it wasn't terrorism.
Something not right about issuing that sort of statement only hours after the incident.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.