There really is no point descending into "whataboutery", it's shallow and just makes false equivalencies. A young woman has now been killed, ostensibly over a statue. This question should have been put to bed when the council voted. It's their jurisdiction and their responsibility. A bluddy statue is not worth killing over. Also I just don't buy the idea...
all because of planned removal of a statue of General Robert E Lee.
leave the statue it's part of american history, trying to homogenize history, imagine removing churchills statue, all generals pms' presidents did what is considered now to be appalling.
The American Civil War had many reasons for starting, but :::::::
"The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become States"
In other words, the South wanted to keep slavery and the north, ie Washington didn't.
By the way, the South lost, something they have yet to accept it would seem.
Those participating seem to be unsavoury supremacist types. But General Lee, he'd be the leader of the South forces in the civil war yes ? And thus a Southern hero figure ? Seems deliberately antagonistic to try to hide that part of US history, then.
I disagree with violent protest and I disagree with suppressing and sanitising history. There’s no education to be had in that. Far better to leave the statue in situ with the addition of an account of the Civil War and the part General Lee played in it.
Naomi....the Far Right in America are not interested in having Lee's part in their history explained. They have exactly the same view of Lee, as the Far Right here in Europe have of Hitler.
The city council voted to remove a statue of Gen Lee.
That is what democracy is supposed to be all about...rule by the will of the people. This rent-a-mob is trying to circumnavigate that will.
So is this a protest by historians then?
Presumably the reason for the fuss is not the issue of the removal of the statue of General Lee (democratically approved it would seem), but its excuse as a rallying cry by people for whom I think in all honesty mikey the term "bigot" is rather kind.
why stop there any statues of truman..who gave the green light to drop the atomic bomb on hiroshima, less we offend any americans of japanese origin..what about custer and the indians...
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.