um the law is the same here
they need a warrant ( clearly this doesnt cover drawing blood at police stations )
also the chain of command thingey isnt fulfilled - you have to be sure that the sample is of the patient or else it may get thrown out of court.
we dont get the back story
would the reaction be the same if there no video ?
phone viddies are discouraged in clinical areas - did they start filming because the situation had already got out of hand ?
she wasnt mirandised - "you need nart say anything but anything you do ....." etc
and finally
what happened to the blood sample ?
if she has drawn it for a SMAC-12 or 24 with consent
is is lawful for a policeman to say - "no hold on that - we're taking it....."
was it a lawful arrest ? and do you unarrest someone by the mayor ringing up and saying - "we terribly sawwy"
that's because you cant identify an unlawful act when you see one. The one in the blue dress screaming "help me someone!" has been obviously unlawfully arrested.
[please note this post has been specially rewritten so Talbo can understand it]
Nursey is not holding a blood sample ( kinda odd shaped anyway) and saying "no no it is mine!"
she is refusing to draw blood on an unconscious patient at the order of a p'lice man
I guess the missing "on" was never meant to be there :-)
In retrospect maybe it could have been worded differently as it caught a number of readers out. Admittedly after a post here implying the erroneous interpretation.