Knife Man Attacks Soldier In Paris.

[anotheoldgit]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4886906/Knifeman-attacks-French-soldier-Paris.html

Why is France more prone to terrorist attacks?

[Peter Pedant]

good answer from Ich and predictably ridiculed by others

The French themselves somewhere say it is based in their history as the north african colonies were integrated into the metropolitan political structure

[so the english equivalent would be that there was an MP for Pretoria and he would sit in the London House of Commons]

This in itself wouldlead to greater migration / immigration and account for the 11% prevalence of north african immigrants

who are mainly now marginalised, unemployed and live in ghettos

[-Talbot-]

Unfortunately this is just one of many incidents today.

[vetuste_ennemi]

//...who are mainly now marginalised, unemployed and live in ghettos//

Living off the public purse, then. That's a comment on the last two points. Need a concrete example before I can get what "marginalised" might mean.

OK, that's the profile (am I allowed to use that word?) of the typical terrorist.

So, taking different case, if a family is given refuge, a home and a living in a country, and the kids grow up, are given schooling and attend university, and that same produced a terrorist, then that would be a surprising anomaly, wouldn't it?

I present exhibit A: "Salman Abadi a 22-year man of Libyan decent who was born and grew up in Manchester".

To be followed by further anomalies - exhibits B-Z.

[Peter Pedant]

I invoke Durkheims anomie
altho I probably wouldnt if I hadnt had a year of it at uni

http://criminology.wikia.com/wiki/Durkheim%27s_Anomie_Theory

[vetuste_ennemi]

The title of the piece suggests a whimsical provocation.

Can you summarise its arguments and point out their relevance to my attack on your rationalisation for terrorism?