ChatterBank2 mins ago
Scottish Far-Right Group To Be Outlawed.
47 Answers
https:/
Why is it unlawful to fight in defence of one's race and nation"?
Why is it unlawful to fight in defence of one's race and nation"?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
lol Gromit
I do think though that it is not helpful, when justifying bans like this, merely to label them "right wing" (or indeed "left wing").
The reasoning has to be made clear as support for or suspicion of participation in or orchestrating of, divisive or violent actions.
Otherwise we are going to get the sort of question aog raises, which has, as gromit says, a simple answer.
I do think though that it is not helpful, when justifying bans like this, merely to label them "right wing" (or indeed "left wing").
The reasoning has to be made clear as support for or suspicion of participation in or orchestrating of, divisive or violent actions.
Otherwise we are going to get the sort of question aog raises, which has, as gromit says, a simple answer.
Some of you conveniently seem to be taking this "fight in defence of one's race and nation" literately.
Can't you see or don't you want to see that it means to protest against the gradual demise of our culture and well being of our once great nation and against the measures that have been taken to turn this nation into a multicultural one.
Can't you see or don't you want to see that it means to protest against the gradual demise of our culture and well being of our once great nation and against the measures that have been taken to turn this nation into a multicultural one.
AOG
You may have missed this bit because it was at the end of the article, and I know you rarely read past the headline:
// Detective Chief Superintendent Gerry McLean, who heads Police Scotland's Organised Crime & Counter Terrorism Unit (OCCTU), said: "National Action is the first domestic extremist group to have been proscribed by the Home Secretary and there is no place in Scotland for these types of extreme right wing views. //
National Action (NA), was classified as a terrorist organisation after celebrating the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox at the hands of a right wing extremist. Encouraging murder, whether it be al qaeda, or national Action, is not conducive to a stable democracy, and rightly membership should be outlawed.
You may have missed this bit because it was at the end of the article, and I know you rarely read past the headline:
// Detective Chief Superintendent Gerry McLean, who heads Police Scotland's Organised Crime & Counter Terrorism Unit (OCCTU), said: "National Action is the first domestic extremist group to have been proscribed by the Home Secretary and there is no place in Scotland for these types of extreme right wing views. //
National Action (NA), was classified as a terrorist organisation after celebrating the murder of Labour MP Jo Cox at the hands of a right wing extremist. Encouraging murder, whether it be al qaeda, or national Action, is not conducive to a stable democracy, and rightly membership should be outlawed.
jackthehat
/// These groups don't just 'protest' though......they stir up resentment and trouble (and do so knowlingly) and cause more problems than they claim to have identified and are protesting about. ///
That is what protesting is all about, one is bound to resent anyone who is likely to make alterations that effect them.
Are you saying that one should not be allowed to protest, just because it may upset those or certain measures that one is protesting about?
/// Why do they undertake 'combat-training' if not to hoping to get the opportunity to get physical with someone? ///
It's called self defence, which seems a wise move, when constantly being violently opposed by other groups, while peacefully marching or protesting.
/// These groups don't just 'protest' though......they stir up resentment and trouble (and do so knowlingly) and cause more problems than they claim to have identified and are protesting about. ///
That is what protesting is all about, one is bound to resent anyone who is likely to make alterations that effect them.
Are you saying that one should not be allowed to protest, just because it may upset those or certain measures that one is protesting about?
/// Why do they undertake 'combat-training' if not to hoping to get the opportunity to get physical with someone? ///
It's called self defence, which seems a wise move, when constantly being violently opposed by other groups, while peacefully marching or protesting.
"Those left-wing groups don't take to the streets in balaclavas, hiding behind placards and banners and threatening bodily harm to people they have identified as undesirables.
(and I'm meaning as the initial Agitators rather than the 'reactionary' Alt-Left before you leap gleefully on that point!)"
There would be no gleeful leaping if you stated what you claim you meant in the fist place instead of holding forth then immediately backtracking.
(and I'm meaning as the initial Agitators rather than the 'reactionary' Alt-Left before you leap gleefully on that point!)"
There would be no gleeful leaping if you stated what you claim you meant in the fist place instead of holding forth then immediately backtracking.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.