ChatterBank1 min ago
Why Are Doctors Performing Religious Mutilation?
56 Answers
http:// www.bbc .com/ne ws/uk-e ngland- notting hamshir e-41898 408
Surely this is ABH? even with consent.
Surely this is ABH? even with consent.
Answers
As far as I am concerned, circumcision of boys is an entirely unnecessary operation, unless done for medical reasons. To say it is done for religious reasons just adds to the seriousness of the assault charge. As far as this case is concerned, the Doctor proceeded with the circumcision without the consent of the parents, and I fail to see why he has been let off...
13:45 Fri 10th Nov 2017
As far as I am concerned, circumcision of boys is an entirely unnecessary operation, unless done for medical reasons. To say it is done for religious reasons just adds to the seriousness of the assault charge.
As far as this case is concerned, the Doctor proceeded with the circumcision without the consent of the parents, and I fail to see why he has been let off without charge.
As far as this case is concerned, the Doctor proceeded with the circumcision without the consent of the parents, and I fail to see why he has been let off without charge.
I think that medical reasons and religious reasons are inextricably united in that the religious reasons i.e it promotes health and hygiene issues.
MallyJ is quite correct in that partners of circumcised males have a lower incidence of cervical cancer....surely that promotes good health.
Circumcised individuals have a much lower incidence of cancer of the penis .........surely a plus.
Certain conditions that of tight foreskin ( phimosis) and irretractable foreskin (paraphimosis) can be avoided.....surely a health benefit.
Circumcised individuals are less likely to suffer premature ejaculation......not a health benefit perhaps but certainly handy.
Mikey.......this is not to do with "common sense" it is do do with opinions of many people, religious and otherwise.
MallyJ is quite correct in that partners of circumcised males have a lower incidence of cervical cancer....surely that promotes good health.
Circumcised individuals have a much lower incidence of cancer of the penis .........surely a plus.
Certain conditions that of tight foreskin ( phimosis) and irretractable foreskin (paraphimosis) can be avoided.....surely a health benefit.
Circumcised individuals are less likely to suffer premature ejaculation......not a health benefit perhaps but certainly handy.
Mikey.......this is not to do with "common sense" it is do do with opinions of many people, religious and otherwise.
31 July 2013 - The boy is circumcised when he is three months old. His mother later contacts social services.
24 November 2014 - The mother contacts Nottinghamshire Police
Islay makes a good point re. grandparents.
Why did the mother wait 18 months to complain? Could it be that she hadn't seen her child for this period of time and that the grandparents were the custodians?
24 November 2014 - The mother contacts Nottinghamshire Police
Islay makes a good point re. grandparents.
Why did the mother wait 18 months to complain? Could it be that she hadn't seen her child for this period of time and that the grandparents were the custodians?
This is a petition organised by this child's mother. She indicates that the child's father gave his consent to the circumcision - if that is the case, is that sufficient consent for the procedure to be legal?
https:/ /www.ch ange.or g/p/cro wn-pros ecution -and-ge neral-m edical- council -to-res ign-dr- mehat-f rom-pra ctising -furthe r-proce dures-u ntil-th ey-can- guarant ee-that -he-is- followi ng-corr ect-gui delines -to-do- so
https:/
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.